Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2021 Feb 11;99(3):skab045. doi: 10.1093/jas/skab045

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

PMC Copyright notice

Figure 2. — The distribution and influencing factor of phenotypic values of the RFI, and the correlation between gut microbiota and the RFI based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing data. (A) The distribution of phenotypic values of the RFI in 208 experimental pigs. (B) and (C) The effects of sex (B) and batch (C) on phenotypic values of the RFI by Wilcox test. (D) CAG network of OTUs. The Spearman rank correlation was used. The OTUs with correlation coefficients > 0.5 are shown. Grey lines between nodes represent positive correlations, and blue lines refer to the negative correlations. The network was plotted by Cytoscape software (E) A negative correlation between CAG1 and the RFI values. (F) The 21 OTUs showing the tendency of correlation with the RFI by the 2-part model. The broken circles from the inside out indicate Z score = 1.0 and 4.0, respectively.