Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 18;21(5):1706–1716. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbz092

Table 2.

The false discovery rates for these 12 tools with error-free reads

Software Dataset A Dataset B
FP (%) FN (%) FP (%) FN (%)
Decombinator 0.0427 0.6391 0.3248 0.4637
IgBLAST 0.0000 0.0085 0.1303 0.2029
IMGT/HighV-QUEST 0.0009 0.0063 0.1736 0.1596
IMonitor 0.0000 1.1637 0.1765 1.6920
IMSEQ 0.0000 3.0483 0.0000 0.8741
LymAnalyzer 7.0614 0.9908 59.5584 1.3454
MiTCR 0.0000 43.2870 0.0159 9.0488
MiXCR 0.0000 24.0104 0.1612 1.7092
RTCR 0.0336 2.4030 0.1159 0.3545
TCRklass 0.1378 24.5734 2.9391 4.4167
TRIg 0.0000 1.2274 0.0295 1.7520
Vidjil 0.0002 0.0375 0.2457 0.2029

Note: FP: false positive, FN: False negative. The first column listed all the tools used in this analysis.