Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 3;151(3):482–490. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxaa350

TABLE 1.

Effect of study design aspects (effect modifiers) on heterogeneity in TEE outcome among 29 trials comparing lower- and higher-carbohydrate diets1

Modifiers P Qres2 I2res,3 % τ2 remaining4 R 2,5 %
Overall (no modifier) 124.2 81.6 6036
Univariate
 Study duration <0.001 84.7 65.9 2586 57.2
 Difference in carbohydrate 0.001 82.1 71.8 3534 41.5
 TEE method6 0.004 103.6 73.4 3660 39.4
Multivariate
 Study duration <0.001 54.3 51.0 1420 76.5
 Difference in carbohydrate 0.002
 Study duration <0.001 84.1 67.1 2659 56.0
 TEE method 0.919
 Difference in carbohydrate <0.001 56.3 46.4 1173 80.6
 TEE method <0.001
 Study duration 0.011 49.7 46.2 1141 81.1
 Difference in carbohydrate 0.001
 TEE method 0.130
1

TEE, total energy expenditure.

2

Inline graphic is Cochran's Q statistic for heterogeneity remaining after effect modifiers included.

3

Inline graphic is the percentage of variation across studies due to heterogeneity remaining after modifiers included.

4

τ2 is the between-study variability remaining after modifiers included.

5

R 2 is the percentage of variability (τ2) explained by the modifiers in each model.

6

Whole-room calorimetry vs doubly labeled water.