Skip to main content
. 2019 May 7;16(4):989–999. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13133

Table 3.

Clinical baseline distribution between FIS and AFB groups

FIS AFB P‐value
Mean age 47.31 ± 12.26 46.14 ± 11.40 0.81
n 19 48% 21 53%
CI 95% 5.51 4.88
Gender 0.54
Male 12 63% 11 52%
Female 7 37% 10 48%
Race/ethnicity 0.76
Non‐Hispanic White 12 63% 11 52%
African American 6 32 6 29%
Hispanic 1 5% 3 14%
Other 0 0% 1 5%
Tobacco use 0.26
Current 4 21% 3 14%
Past 9 47% 6 29%
Never 6 32% 12 57%
Diabetes status 0.99
No 16 84% 16 76%
Type 1 0 0% 1 5%
Type 2 3 16% 4 19%
Wound location 0.66
Sacrum 8 42% 9 43%
Ischium 8 42% 10 48%
Trochanteric 3 16% 1 5%
Other 0 0% 1 5%
Number of wounds 0.99
Multiple 7 37% 8 38%
Single 12 63% 13 62%
Pre‐closure measurements
Length 10.92 ± 4.51 9.05 ± 2.88 0.12
Width 8.33 ± 3.61 6.19 ± 2.17 0.08
Depth 4.03 ± 1.20 4.15 ± 1.90 0.56
History of wound
Recurrent 4 21% 4 19% 0.99
Non‐recurrent 15 79% 17 81%
No previous Tx 12 67% 11 58% 0.74
Previous Tx 6 33% 8 42%
NPWT 3 60% 4 67% 0.45
AMWT 2 40% 0 0%
Hyperbaric 0 0% 1 17%
Biologics 0 0% 1 17%
Previous debrid. 12 67% 9 45% 0.21
No debrid. 6 33% 11 55%
Prior closure 2 11% 5 25% 0.41
No closure 17 89% 15 75%

Abbreviations: AFB, air‐fluidised bed; AMWT, advanced moist wound therapy; CI, confidence interval; FIS, fluid immersion simulation; NPWT, negative pressure wound therapy.