Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 12;113(3):534–547. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa301

TABLE 3.

Dietary intakes during wash-in and intervention phases, based on unannounced 24-h dietary recalls, for the participants included in the per-protocol analysis for glucose tolerance and related endpoints1

Limited dairy group (n = 22) Low-fat dairy diet (n = 24) Full-fat dairy diet (n = 21) RM-ANOVA (time × diet interaction)2
Wash-in diet period Change during intervention period Wash-in diet period Change during intervention period Wash-in diet period Change during intervention period
Energy intake, kcal/d 1998 [1624–2307] 81 ± 544a 2041 [1526–2625] 224 ± 375a 1712 [1364–2098] 554 ± 467b 0.003
Carbohydrates, %E 46.1 ± 11.4 −0.7 [−4.4 to 0.9]a,b 47.7 ± 8.6 1.6 [−4.3 to 6.2]a 46.3 ± 7.1 −4.1 [−7.6 to −0.8]b 0.020
Total sugars, %E 18.0 ± 7.0 −1.9 ± 5.6a 18.5 ± 6.6 3.4 ± 5.0b 17.1 ± 6.2 0.9 ± 4.7a,b 0.004
Added sugars, %E 9.3 ± 4.5 −0.5 ± 3.3 8.5 ± 4.1 0.7 ± 4.3 9.1 ± 6.1 −0.9 ± 4.1 0.349
Fiber, g/d 23.9 ± 8.9 1.5 ± 7.9 25.7 ± 9.0 −0.3 ± 6.2 21.5 ± 9.0 0.2 ± 5.8 0.650
Fiber, g/1000 kcal 12.3 ± 5.0 0.3 ± 3.8a 12.6 ± 3.4 −1.4 ± 2.5a,b 12.2 ± 4.4 −2.8 ± 3.3b 0.011
Fat, %E 34.0 ± 8.1 1.3 [−2.7 to 5.7]a 34.2 ± 7.7 −2.5 [−8.2 to 0.0]b 35.0 ± 9.0 4.4 [0.6–7.3]a <0.001
SFAs, %E 8.0 ± 2.0 0.7 [−0.3 to 3.8]a 8.2 ± 2.1 0.6 [−1.5 to 2.1]a 8.7 ± 2.6 5.2 [3.4–6.9]b <0.001
MUFAs, E% 14.1 ± 4.3 −0.3 ± 3.8a 14.0 ± 3.9 −3.1 ± 2.5b 13.7 ± 4.1 −0.2 ± 4.6a 0.014
PUFAs, %E 9.2 ± 2.8 0.3 ± 2.3 9.3 ± 3.1 −1.8 ± 3.0 9.7 ± 3.5 −1.1 ± 3.4 0.058
Protein, %E 15.4 [12.5–18.1] 0.0 ± 0.1 16.2 [13.7–17.7] 0.1 ± 0.1 15.3 [14.1–18.6] 0.0 ± 0.1 0.024
2015 Healthy Eating Index 71.9 ± 9.2 −2.5 ± 10.0a,b 72.8 ± 9.7 2.9 ± 8.7a 72.2 ± 8.5 −5.6 ± 7.6b 0.008
Calcium, mg/1000 kcal 307 [222–440] −9 ± 150a 298 [252–358] 401 ± 167b 338 [276–426] 277 ± 194b <0.001
1

n = 67. Values are means ± SDs or medians [IQRs] for nonnormally distributed variables. RM-ANOVA, repeated-measures analysis of variance; %E, percentage of total energy intake.

2

Reflects an overall comparison of the 3 dietary phases by RM-ANOVA. Values with different superscript letters are statistically significantly different in Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc testing (P < 0.017).