TABLE 3.
Associations of long-term diet quality and food intakes with common gut microbiome taxa in the Shanghai Women's and Men's Health Studies
Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus species | Median relative abundance, % | Prevalence, % | β (SE) for Q5 vs. Q11 | P value | β (SE) for 1-SD increase1 | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Healthy diet score (average) | ||||||||||
Firmicutes | 28.3 | 100 | 0.095 (0.039) | 0.01 | 0.027 (0.012) | 0.03 | ||||
Firmicutes | Clostridia | 27.1 | 100 | 0.108 (0.040) | 0.007 | 0.030 (0.013) | 0.02 | |||
Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Lachnospiraceae | Coprococcus | 0.63 | 99.1 | 0.297 (0.095) | 0.002 | 0.100 (0.030) | 0.001 |
Actinobacteria | 0.47 | 99.8 | 0.225 (0.114) | 0.04 | 0.081 (0.037) | 0.03 | ||||
Actinobacteria | Actinobacteria | 0.33 | 97.7 | 0.351 (0.142) | 0.01 | 0.123 (0.045) | 0.007 | |||
Actinobacteria | Actinobacteria | Bifidobacteriales | 0.30 | 92.3 | 0.394 (0.158) | 0.01 | 0.139 (0.050) | 0.006 | ||
Actinobacteria | Actinobacteria | Bifidobacteriales | Bifidobacteriaceae | Bifidobacterium | 0.30 | 92.1 | 0.411 (0.158) | 0.009 | 0.149 (0.050) | 0.003 |
Healthy diet score (most recent) | ||||||||||
Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Lachnospiraceae | Blautia obeum | 0.07 | 88.2 | 0.256 (0.104) | 0.01 | 0.090 (0.033) | 0.007 |
Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Lachnospiraceae | Coprococcus | 0.63 | 99.1 | 0.229 (0.094) | 0.01 | 0.087 (0.030) | 0.004 |
Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Ruminococcaceae | Faecalibacterium | 5.35 | 98.7 | 0.313 (0.126) | 0.01 | 0.105 (0.040) | 0.009 |
Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Ruminococcaceae | Faecalibacterium prausnitzii | 5.17 | 98.7 | 0.313 (0.126) | 0.01 | 0.104 (0.040) | 0.009 |
Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Ruminococcaceae | Unknown | 0.43 | 98.9 | 0.215 (0.122) | 0.08 | 0.091 (0.031) | 0.004 |
Actinobacteria | Actinobacteria | Bifidobacteriales | Bifidobacteriaceae | Bifidobacterium adolescentis | 0.05 | 76.6 | 0.297 (0.145) | 0.04 | 0.120 (0.046) | 0.01 |
Bacteroidetes | Bacteroidia | Bacteroidales | Odoribacteraceae | Butyricimonas | 0.08 | 65.2 | 0.246 (0.149) | 0.09 | 0.122 (0.047) | 0.01 |
Bacteroidetes | Bacteroidia | Bacteroidales | Bacteroidaceae | Bacteroides uniformis | 1.85 | 98.1 | 0.257 (0.137) | 0.06 | 0.110 (0.044) | 0.01 |
Dairy2 | ||||||||||
Actinobacteria | 0.47 | 99.8 | 0.465 (0.120) | 0.0001 | 0.120 (0.038) | 0.002 | ||||
Actinobacteria | Actinobacteria | 0.33 | 97.7 | 0.557 (0.149) | 0.0002 | 0.136 (0.048) | 0.004 | |||
Actinobacteria | Actinobacteria | Bifidobacteriales | 0.30 | 92.3 | 0.581 (0.165) | 0.0004 | 0.141 (0.053) | 0.008 | ||
Actinobacteria | Actinobacteria | Bifidobacteriales | Bifidobacteriaceae | 0.30 | 92.3 | 0.581 (0.165) | 0.0004 | 0.141 (0.053) | 0.08 | |
Actinobacteria | Actinobacteria | Bifidobacteriales | Bifidobacteriaceae | Bifidobacterium | 0.30 | 92.1 | 0.559 (0.165) | 0.0007 | 0.129 (0.053) | 0.01 |
Fish and seafood2 | ||||||||||
Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Lachnospiraceae | Coprococcus | 0.63 | 99.1 | 0.269 (0.094) | 0.004 | 0.081 (0.030) | 0.007 |
Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Ruminococcaceae | Unknown | 0.43 | 98.9 | 0.296 (0.097) | 0.002 | 0.070 (0.031) | 0.02 |
Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | 2.81 | 96.9 | 0.255 (0.127) | 0.04 | 0.106 (0.041) | 0.009 | |||
Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Burkholderiales | 2.80 | 96.5 | 0.292 (0.131) | 0.02 | 0.114 (0.042) | 0.007 | ||
Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Burkholderiales | Alcaligenaceae | 2.78 | 95.7 | 0.324 (0.135) | 0.02 | 0.115 (0.043) | 0.008 | |
Proteobacteria | Deltaproteobacteria | 0.23 | 88.9 | 0.382 (0.124) | 0.002 | 0.127 (0.040) | 0.001 | |||
Proteobacteria | Deltaproteobacteria | Desulfovibrionales | 0.23 | 88.8 | 0.385 (0.124) | 0.002 | 0.125 (0.040) | 0.002 | ||
Proteobacteria | Deltaproteobacteria | Desulfovibrionales | Desulfovibrionaceae | 0.23 | 88.8 | 0.387 (0.123) | 0.002 | 0.124 (0.040) | 0.002 | |
Nuts and legumes2 | ||||||||||
Proteobacteria | 6.18 | 100 | 0.110 (0.061) | 0.07 | 0.046 (0.019) | 0.02 | ||||
Processed meat2 | ||||||||||
Firmicutes | Clostridia | 27.1 | 100 | −0.127 (0.048) | 0.008 | −0.035 (0.020) | 0.08 | |||
Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | 27.1 | 100 | −0.127 (0.048) | 0.008 | −0.035 (0.020) | 0.08 | ||
Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Lachnospiraceae | 9.87 | 100 | −0.171 (0.061) | 0.005 | −0.055 (0.026) | 0.03 | |
Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Lachnospiraceae | Roseburia | 2.36 | 97.7 | −0.522 (0.151) | 0.0006 | −0.142 (0.064) | 0.03 |
Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Lachnospiraceae | Roseburia faecis | 1.14 | 95.4 | −0.569 (0.167) | 0.0007 | −0.175 (0.071) | 0.01 |
Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Lachnospiraceae | Roseburia other | 0.25 | 92.5 | −0.440 (0.141) | 0.002 | −0.145 (0.060) | 0.01 |
General linear regression β coefficient (SE) for the fifth compared with first quintile (Q5 compared with Q1) and each SD increment of the healthy diet score and food intakes. The model was adjusted for age at stool sample collection, sex, income, smoking status, alcohol drinking status, leisure-time physical activity, total energy intake, BMI, and history of hypertension. Results with a false discovery rate <0.10 are shown. Tests were conducted for common taxa, including 5 phyla, 10 classes, 12 orders, 21 families, 39 genera, and 62 species.
Intakes of 7 food groups (fruit, vegetables, dairy, fish/seafood, nuts/legumes, refined grains, and red meat) were cumulative average intakes. The intake frequency of processed meat was assessed only at baseline.