Table 2.
+++ Best, ++ better, + acceptable | Biopsy | Swab | Canister/Drain fluid | Absorption and extraction |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ease of sample collection | ++ Technique critical | +++ | +++ | |
Cost | +++ | +++ Not considering the cost of the therapy itself | +++ Depends on collection and preservation supplies | |
Patient comfort | ++ | +++ | ++ | |
Sample quality and consistency | +++ Procedure most likely performed by highly trained personnel | +++ When using Z technique and correct preservation methods | +++ When comparing samples from the same patient over time | +++ Collection and processing technique critical. Well matched to point‐of‐care diagnostics |
Gene expression/PCR | +++ Samples snap frozen with RNase inhibitors | |||
Bioburden | +++ Samples stored, processed and analysed for both aerobic and anaerobic organisms | ++ Samples stored, processed and analysed for both aerobic and anaerobic organisms | ||
Biomarker analysis | + Samples frozen with protease inhibitors | +++ Samples frozen with protease inhibitors. Take into consideration dilution of protease inhibitors over time. Samples should be compared only with other samples collected in the same manner (NPWT, surgical drain) | ++ Samples frozen with protease inhibitors. Whatman paper discs, Periopaper. Would be useful to develop collection materials specific to this purpose |
PCR, polymerase chain reaction; NPWT, negative pressure wound therapy.