Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 15;14(6):898–908. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12723

Table 4.

Summary of the outcome measurements of the controlled clinical studies

Authors Mean time of reepithelisation (days) Reduction in WSA Proportion of wound healing (%) Blood flow Safety and adverse reaction
ESWT C‐group ESWT C‐group ESWT C‐group ESWT C‐group
Omar et al., 2014 27 64·5 ± 8·06* 81·17 ± 4·35 83%* 63% 54% complete healing* 33·5% healed ≥ 50% 12·5% unchanged 28·5% completed healing 19% healed ≥50% 52·5% unchanged N/A N/A Not observed
Wang et al., 2014 28 N/A N/A N/A N/A 43% (DM group), 71% (NDM group) completed DM group 0·11 (0·04–0·3) Not observed
healing 3% (DM group), 6% (NDM group) NDM group 0·28* (0·07–0·8)
healed ≥ 50% 27% (DM group), 10 (NDM group)
unchanged 27% (DM group), 13 (NDM group) failure
Nossair et al., 2013 29 N/A N/A 78%* 44% 83% complete healing* 49% complete healing N/A N/A N/A
Saggini et al., 2013 30 N/A N/A 80%* 67% 71% complete healing* 29% partially healed 40% completed healing 37·5% partially healed 22·5% unchanged N/A N/A Not observed
Wang et al., 2011 32 N/A N/A N/A N/A 57% complete healing* 32% healed ≥ 50% 11% unchanged 25% completed healing 15% healed ≥50% 60% unchanged 0·61* (0·40–0·79) 0·50 (0·11–0·53) Not observed
Wang et al., 2009 34 N/A N/A N/A N/A 31% complete healing* 58% improved 11% unchanged 22% completed healing 50% improved 28% unchanged 0·75* (0·46–1·28) 0·58 (0·51–0·66) Not observed
Moretti et al., 2009 35 60·8 ± 4·7* 82·2 ± 4·7 N/A N/A 53·3% complete healing* 33·3% complete healing N/A N/A N/A
Saggini et al., 2008 36 N/A N/A N/A N/A 53·3% complete healing* 10% complete healing N/A N/A No adverse reaction

C‐group, comparison group; DM, diabetes mellitus; ESWT, extracorporeal shock wave therapy; N/A, not available; NDM, non‐diabetes mellitus; WSA, wound surface area.

*P value ≤ 0·05.