Table 4.
Authors | Mean time of reepithelisation (days) | Reduction in WSA | Proportion of wound healing (%) | Blood flow | Safety and adverse reaction | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESWT | C‐group | ESWT | C‐group | ESWT | C‐group | ESWT | C‐group | ||
Omar et al., 2014 27 | 64·5 ± 8·06* | 81·17 ± 4·35 | 83%* | 63% | 54% complete healing* 33·5% healed ≥ 50% 12·5% unchanged | 28·5% completed healing 19% healed ≥50% 52·5% unchanged | N/A | N/A | Not observed |
Wang et al., 2014 28 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 43% (DM group), 71% (NDM group) completed | DM group 0·11 (0·04–0·3) | Not observed | ||
healing 3% (DM group), 6% (NDM group) | NDM group 0·28* (0·07–0·8) | ||||||||
healed ≥ 50% 27% (DM group), 10 (NDM group) | |||||||||
unchanged 27% (DM group), 13 (NDM group) failure | |||||||||
Nossair et al., 2013 29 | N/A | N/A | 78%* | 44% | 83% complete healing* | 49% complete healing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Saggini et al., 2013 30 | N/A | N/A | 80%* | 67% | 71% complete healing* 29% partially healed | 40% completed healing 37·5% partially healed 22·5% unchanged | N/A | N/A | Not observed |
Wang et al., 2011 32 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 57% complete healing* 32% healed ≥ 50% 11% unchanged | 25% completed healing 15% healed ≥50% 60% unchanged | 0·61* (0·40–0·79) | 0·50 (0·11–0·53) | Not observed |
Wang et al., 2009 34 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 31% complete healing* 58% improved 11% unchanged | 22% completed healing 50% improved 28% unchanged | 0·75* (0·46–1·28) | 0·58 (0·51–0·66) | Not observed |
Moretti et al., 2009 35 | 60·8 ± 4·7* | 82·2 ± 4·7 | N/A | N/A | 53·3% complete healing* | 33·3% complete healing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Saggini et al., 2008 36 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 53·3% complete healing* | 10% complete healing | N/A | N/A | No adverse reaction |
C‐group, comparison group; DM, diabetes mellitus; ESWT, extracorporeal shock wave therapy; N/A, not available; NDM, non‐diabetes mellitus; WSA, wound surface area.
*P value ≤ 0·05.