Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 21;10(5):597–605. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01029.x

Table 2.

Microvascular blood flow in the wound edge during negative pressure wound therapy at various pressures using pathogen‐binding mesh, foam and gauze, measured using laser Doppler velocimetry

−40 mmHg −60 mmHg −80 mmHg −120 mmHg
Measurements were performed 0·5 cm from the wound edge
  Pathogen‐binding mesh −12 ± 6% −19 ± 6% −21 ± 6% −15 ± 8% n.s.
  Gauze −13 ± 3% −17 ± 4% −22 ± 5% −24 ± 4% n.s.
  Foam −27 ± 5% −31 ± 4% −33 ± 4% −36 ± 4% n.s.
Foam versus gauze or mesh P < 0·05 Foam versus gauze or mesh P < 0·05 Foam versus gauze or mesh P < 0·05 Foam versus gauze or mesh P < 0·05
Measurements were performed 2·5 cm from the wound edge
  Pathogen‐binding mesh +45 ± 18% +54 ± 18% +60 ± 17% +61 ± 16% n.s.
  Gauze +38 ± 6% +50 ± 9% +50 ± 8% +54 ± 9% n.s.
  Foam +40 ± 8% +58 ± 15% +58 ± 14% +54 ± 12% n.s.
n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s.

Microvascular blood flow is expressed as percent change relative to baseline values. Values are presented as means ± standard error of the mean (n = 8).