Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 20;10(2):203–209. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.00958.x

Table 3.

Absolute limb volume reduction and percent limb volume reduction (ml)

N Mean (SD) Difference 95% CI t‐value P value
Absolute limb volume reduction
 Canada 12 824 (233) −772 −1585 to 41 −1.97 0·062
 UK 12 1596 (315)
 Arm 8 438 (209) −1157 −1941 to −375 3·07 0·006
 Leg 16 1596 (1046)
 Working 12 1010 (335) −399 −1263 to 464 −0·96 0·348
 Not working 12 1410 (247)
 Stage II 12 1284 (333) 147 −733 to 1026 0·35 0·733
 Stage III 12 1137 (263)
Percent limb volume reduction
 Canada 12 14·6 (10·6) −1·4 −8·7 to 5·8 −0·41 0·686
 UK 12 16·1 (6·0)
 Arm 12 16·1 (4·7) 1·2 −6·5 to 9·0 0·33 0·747
 Leg 12 14·9 (9·9)
 Working 12 11·5 (9·4) −7·7 −14·2 to −1·2 −2·45 0·023
 Not working 12 19·2 (5·4)
 Stage II 12 16·1 (5·7) 1·5 −5·8 to 8·8 0·43 0·674
 Stage III 12 14·6 (10·8)