Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 9;11(5):489–495. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01114.x

Table 1.

Grade of wound reepithelialisation 2, 7 and 14 days after surgical intervention (Pearson chi‐square test)

Day Group Total Histopathologic scale to evaluate reepithelialisation: n (%)
Grade 0  Grade 1  Grade 2  Grade 3  Grade 4  P value
2 Apigenin 16  1 (6·25)  12 (75) 3 (18·75)  0 (0) 0 (0) 0·022
PLX 16 3 (18·75) 3 (18·75) 9 (56·25)  1 (6·25) 0 (0)
Vehicle 16 6 (37·50) 8 (50) 2 (12·50)  0 (0) 0 (0)
Control 16 5 (31·25) 8 (50) 3 (18·75)  0 (0) 0 (0)
7 Apigenin 16 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 11 (68·75) 5 (31·25) 0·040
PLX 16 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)  9 (56·25) 7 (43·75)
Vehicle 16 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (6·25) 14 (87·50) 1 (6·25)
Control 16 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (18·75) 11 (68·75) 2 (12·50)
14 Apigenin 16 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)  2 (12·50) 14 (87·50) 0·751
PLX 16 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)  2 (12·50) 14 (87·50)
Vehicle 16 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)  4 (25) 12 (75)
Control 16 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)  3 (18·75) 13 (81·25)

Grade 0, reepithelialisation at the edge of the wound; Grade 1, reepithelialisation covering less than half of the wound; Grade 2, reepithelialisation covering more than half of the wound; Grade 3, reepithelialisation covering the entire wound with irregular thickness; Grade 4, reepithelialisation covering the entire wound with normal thickness.