Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 3;11(1):85–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01071.x

Table 3.

FCD values measured using OPS for skin graft donor sites and FTCW and other analyses*

FCD for FTCW FCD for donor site Macroscopic appearance of wounds Incidence of infection Microscopic inflammation (H&E) Microscopic collagen tissue (Trichrome)
Fine mesh gauze 20·7 ± 6·6 29·6 ± 4 6 (1·2) 0 + + + ++
MPH 28·5 ± 3·2 27 ± 3·6 8·1 (0·8) 0 ++ + + +
Clinoptilolite 26·2 ± 1·8 24·9 ± 3·7 8·9 (1·8) 0 + + + +
Alginate 20·8 ± 6·6 23·8 ± 8·2 8·3 (0·7) 0 + +
Hydrogel 23·5 ± 5·4 30·8 ± 3·2 7·3 (1·3) 0 + ++
Biobrane® 19 ± 2·9 23·1 ± 3·6 5·2 (1·4) 2/8 + + + + + +
P = 0·041 P = 0·011 P = 0·098

FCD, functional capillary density; FTCW, full‐thickness cutaneous wounds; H&E, haematoxylin‐eosin; MPH, microporous polysaccharide hemosphere; OPS, orthogonal polarisation spectral.

*Statistical significance was obtained for three measures, and are expressed in bold.