Skip to main content
. 2008 May 20;5(2):351–360. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2008.00491.x

Table 7.

Staff impressions questionnaire

Item Pre Post
Ease of use • 12·5% exceptional • 28·6% exceptional
• 50% very easy • 71·4% very easy
• 37·5% moderately easy
“Doability” (ability to incorporate into practice) • 12·5% exceptionally doable • 85·7% very doable
• 25% very doable • 14·3% moderately doable
• 50% moderately doable
Time required to complete LLLT • 25% minimal time • 85·7% moderate time
• 75% moderate time • 14.3% significant time
Overall usefulness of LLLT • 25% exceptional • 85·7% very useful/effective
• 25% very useful/effective • 14.3% moderately useful/effective
• 37·5% moderately useful
• 12·5% somewhat ineffective
Comments “I’m skeptical” “Improved rate of healing, decreased total healing time.”
“Not sure this is going to work” “The LLLT for wound care is excellent. We have seen much improvement.”
“I feel this laser therapy has been a very good idea. I have seen much progress in all wounds since we have been doing this. I hope we will be using it again.”
“Seems to be effective for some residents but ineffective for some other chronic wounds/ulcers.”