Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 11;95:107522. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107522

Table 3.

Comparison of the study outcomes in Favipiravir and Lopinavir/Ritonavir treatment regimens.

Modified ITT population
Per-protocol population
Favipiravir(N = 190) Lopinavir/Ritonavir (N = 183) Total (N = 373) Favipiravir(N = 153) Lopinavir/Ritonavir (N = 147) Total (N = 300)
In-hospital mortality - no. (%) 26 (13.7) 21 (11.5) 47 (12.6) Χ2 = 0.41; p = 0.52 22 (14.4) 17 (11.6) 39 (13) Χ2 = 0.53; p = 0.47
Intubation - no. (%) 27 (14.2) 17 (9.3) 44 (11.8) Χ2 = 2.17; p = 0.14 23 (15.0) 13 (8.8) 36 (12) Χ2 = 2.72; p = 0.1
ICU admission - no. (%) 31 (16.3) 25 (13.7) 56 (15.0) Χ2 = 0.51; p = 0.47 26 (17.0) 18 (12.2) 44 (14.7) Χ2 = 1.35; p = 0.25
Median length of hospital stay - days (IQR)a 7 (4–9); n = 153 6 (4–10); n = 150 6 (4–10); n = 303 Mann-Whitney U test: p = 0.85 6 (4–9); n = 124 6 (4–9); n = 122 6 (4–9); n = 246
Mann-Whitney U test: p = 0.92
Median survival time till clinical recovery - days (IQRb) 6 (4–10); n = 185 6 (4–10); n = 182 Log-rank Χ2 = 0.38; p = 0.54 6 (4–9); n = 150 5 (3–9); n = 147 Log-rank Χ2 = 0.38; p = 0.54
a

patients discharged against medical advice were excluded

b

Inter Quartile Range