Table 4.
Study | Pain | Postoperative analgesia | Return to normal activities (mean in days ± SD) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score (mean VAS scale from 0 to 10 ± SD) | Timepoint | ||||
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty | |||||
Karahaliloglu et al. 8 | - | - | - | ||
Jahanshahi et al. 11 | - | - | - | ||
Brusciano et al. 12 |
2 (0–3)a 0 |
0–3 days 4 days |
- | 1-2a | |
Plapler et al. 13 | LH/HC | 0.8 ± 1.1/1.8 ± 0.7c | 0–28 days | Diclofenacb | - |
Naderan et al. 14 | LH/HC |
5.7 ± 1.5/5.2 ± 1.3 4.2 ± 1.4/5.2 ± 1.2 2.9 ± 1.5/4.1 ± 1.3 1.6 ± 1.5/2.7 ± 1.5 |
6 h 12 h 18 h 24 h |
Morphine (in the recovery room)b | - |
Alsisy et al. 15 | LH/HC | 2 (1–8)a/6 (3–10)a, c | 1 day | Oral analgesiab | 7.5 ± 1.8 vs 22.9 ± 3.9c |
Poskus et al. 16 | LH/MP/HC | 3.1/2.7/5.0c | - | - | 15 (5–14)a vs 24 (9–30)a vs 30 (14–35)a, c |
Hemorrhoidal laser procedure | |||||
Salfi et al. 9 | - | - | - | ||
Giamundo et al. 17 | 1.4 ± 1.7 | 0–3 days | - | - | |
Crea et al. 18 |
0 (0–2)d, e 0 (0–2)d, e |
1 week 1 month |
- | Immediately | |
De Nardi et al. 19 |
0.1 (0–1)a, e 0.1 (0–2)a, e0.0e |
3 months 12 months 24 months |
Paracetamolb | 0–3a | |
Boarini et al. 20 | 1.4 (0–3)a | 0–2 h | - | - | |
Giamundo et al. 21 |
1.1 (0–5)d 0.9 ± 0.8 1.1 ± 1.0 |
2 weeks 6 months 12 months |
Paracetamolb | - | |
Giamundo et al. 22 | HeLP/RBL |
1.1 (0–2)d/2.9 (1–5)c, d 0.8 (0–2)d/1.0 (0–3)d |
1–3 days 2 weeks |
- | - |
VAS visual analog scale, SD standard deviation, “-” not available, LH laser hemorrhoidoplasty, HC hemorrhoidectomy, MP mucopexy, HeLP hemorrhoidal laser procedure, RBL rubber band ligation
aExpressed as range
bAdministered on request
cthe difference was statistically significant
dExpressed as median (range)
eVAS scale ranged from 0 to 3