Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Vasc Surg. 2020 Sep 12;73(4):1361–1367.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.130

Quantifying the risk-adjusted hospital costs of postoperative complications after lower extremity bypass in patients with claudication

Rebecca Sorber a, Husain N Alshaikh b, Besma Nejim c, Christopher J Abularrage a, James H Black III a, Mahmoud B Malas d, Caitlin W Hicks a,b
PMCID: PMC7952461  NIHMSID: NIHMS1650475  PMID: 32931872

Abstract

Objective:

Increasing evidence has shown that the risks associated with surgical revascularization for intermittent claudication outweigh the benefits. The aim of our study was to quantify the cost of care associated with perioperative complications after elective lower extremity bypass (LEB) in patients presenting with intermittent claudication.

Methods:

All patients undergoing first-time LEB for claudication in the Healthcare Database (2009–2015) were included. The primary outcome was in-hospital postoperative complications, including major adverse limb events (MALE), major adverse cardiac events (MACE), acute kidney injury, and wound complications. The overall crude hospital costs are reported, and a generalized linear model with log link and inverse Gaussian distribution was used to calculate the predicted hospital costs for specific complications.

Results:

Overall, 7154 patients had undergone elective LEB for claudication during the study period. The median age was 66 years (interquartile range, 59–73 years), 67.5% were male, and 75.3% were white. Two thirds of patients (61.2%) had Medicare insurance, followed by private insurance (26.9%), Medicaid (7.7%), and other insurance (4.2%). In-hospital complications occurred in 8.5% of patients, including acute kidney injury in 3.0%, MALE in 2.8%, wound complications in 2.3%, and MACE in 1.0%. The overall median crude hospital cost was $11,783 (interquartile range, $8911-$15,767) per patient. The incremental increase in cost associated with a postoperative complication was significant, ranging from $6183 (95% confidence interval, $4604-$7762) for MALE to $10,485 (95% confidence interval, $6529-$14,441) for MACE after risk adjustment.

Conclusions:

Postoperative complications after elective LEB for claudication are not uncommon and increase the in-hospital costs by 46% to 78% depending on the complication. Surgical revascularization for claudication should be used sparingly in carefully selected patients.

Keywords: Intermittent claudication, Lower extremity bypass, Postoperative complications, Premier Healthcare Database, Structured exercise therapy


Intermittent claudication is the most common clinical manifestation of symptomatic peripheral artery disease.1 Its natural history is usually benign, with <5% of patients progressing to chronic limb-threatening ischemia requiring major amputation.13 The consensus-based guidelines for the management of peripheral artery disease have emphasized that surgical intervention for claudication should only be pursued after a failed response to best medical therapy and supervised exercise therapy.4 More specifically, the Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines state that lower extremity bypass (LEB) can be offered for claudication after a failed trial of medical therapy if a >50% likelihood exists of sustained improvement in function, symptom relief, and bypass patency at 2 years.2

Data from the Vascular Quality Initiative revealed that 26% of all LEBs performed from 2009 to 2014 were performed for claudication.57 Although LEB has had reasonable short-term outcomes and long-term patency,8,9 the long-term benefits and cost-effectiveness of surgery performed for claudication are questionable.10 In addition, the occurrence of postoperative complications after LEB is not uncommon.11,12 A recent analysis of data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) reported that postoperative complications occurred in ≤17% of patients undergoing LEB for claudication.9 These complications, which include renal, cardiac, and limb-based complications, will frequently require intensive care unit admission or additional procedures.13

The costs to the healthcare system incurred by postoperative complications after LEB are likely significant.14,15 However, limited data quantifying the in-hospital costs associated with elective LEB complications in patients with claudication are available. The aim of our study was to quantify the costs of care associated with perioperative complications after LEB performed for claudication, in particular with respect to in-hospital events.

METHODS

Study design.

We performed a retrospective cohort study of data from the Premier Healthcare Database (PHD; Premier Inc, Charlotte, NC). The PHD is a large database of inpatient and hospital-based outpatient data with payer information from all sources (ie, Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance) that accrues data from >700 U.S. hospitals in academic, nonacademic, government, and community spheres and both urban and rural settings.16 Within the PHD, 79% of the patients have government insurance (Medicare, Medicaid, managed care). The PHD captures roughly 20% of inpatient discharges in the United States overall. Although the PHD is not surgically focused and cannot be used to assess provider- or hospital-level procedure volumes, its diverse capture, linkage with claims information, and inclusion of Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance make it a powerful tool to examine the costs associated with purely elective operations.

The diagnoses and procedures within the PHD are based on administrative claims data using International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision (ICD-9), codes. The cost data are self-reported to the PHD by the hospitals, and, as such, the reported costs are determined by each institution’s own accounting system.16 The hospitals that use cost/charge ratios provide the PHD with the charge data, and teams at Premier work with the hospitals to assign Medicare cost/charge ratios to the data provided. All financial data included in the PHD are reviewed and validated against local- and region-specific data before inclusion in the PHD.16 Some fees, such as professional fees, are not reported by the PHD because these are charge, rather than cost, data and remain proprietary between the institution and payer. This is also true of reimbursement data, which are not available from the PHD.

The study cohort included all adult patients (aged ≥18 years) who had undergone inpatient admission for first-time elective LEB for claudication from July 2009 to March 2015. We used the ICD-9 codes 39.25 and 39.29 to capture LEB procedures. Restricting the cohort to intermittent claudication accounted for 28% of LEB procedures performed for peripheral arterial disease during the study period, with the remainder of patients classified as having chronic limb-threatening ischemia. The diagnosis of claudication was determined from the admitting or principle diagnosis. To restrict the analysis to patients undergoing LEB as the index intervention for claudication, we excluded any patients who had undergone an ipsilateral endovascular intervention before or on the same day as the LEB operation, any patients with a previous admission for ipsilateral LEB, and any patients who had undergone concomitant abdominal aortic aneurysm repair during the same admission for LEB. Finally, all patients with missing data related to sex, race, provider, or cost of hospitalization were excluded from the present study. The institutional review board approved the present study and waived the informed consent requirements given the de-identified data source.

Study outcomes.

The primary outcome of the study was the cost associated with any in-hospital postoperative complication. Postoperative complications included acute kidney injury or new hemodialysis, wound complications, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; defined as myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack, stroke, or death), and major adverse limb events (MALE; defined as major amputation, operative bypass revision, or lower extremity endovascular intervention). The costs for the hospital stay were computed overall and divided into subcategories (ie, operation room, room and board, supplies, laboratory tests, pharmacy, and other) and are reported as total, fixed, and variable costs for each subcategory. All costs were adjusted for inflation to 2015 U.S. dollars using the Consumer Price Indexes from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.17

Statistical analysis.

We described the study cohort, key hospital characteristics, and frequency of postoperative complications using descriptive statistics. The crude hospital costs were analyzed with a generalized linear model with log link. An inverse Gaussian distribution was then used to calculate the predicted hospital costs overall and for specific complication events. We have also reported the estimated incremental cost increase and relative cost increase for each event. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata, version 14.1 (StataCorp LP, College Station Tex). The data were considered statistically significant at a level of α ≤ .05.

RESULTS

Study cohort.

Overall, 7154 patients had undergone elective LEB for claudication during the study period (Table I). The median age was 66 years (interquartile range [IQR], 59–73 years), 67.5% were male, and 75.3% were white. Two thirds of the patients (61.2%) had Medicare insurance, followed by private insurance (26.9%), Medicaid (7.7%), and other insurance (4.2%). More than one third of the patients (36.9%) were current smokers, and hypertension (79.2%), hyperlipidemia (59.0%), and coronary artery disease (43.4%) were common. Most procedures had been performed at urban hospitals (87.3%) of medium size (300–599 beds; 52.7%). The geographic distribution of the procedures roughly approximated the population density reported in the census.15

Table I.

Baseline patient characteristics (N = 7154; 2009–2015)

Characteristic Total, No. (%)
Demographics
 Age, years
  Median 66
  IQR 59–73
 Female sex 2326 (32.5)
 Race
  White 5389 (75.3)
  Black 822 (11.5)
  Other 943 (13.2)
 Insurance carrier
  Medicare 4381 (61.2)
  Medicaid 553 (7.7)
  Private 1921 (26.9)
  Other 299 (4.2)
Comorbidity
 Tobacco use
  Never 2446 (34.2)
  Previous 2071 (28.9)
  Current 2637 (36.9)
 Hypertension 5667 (79.2)
 Hyperlipidemia 4221 (59.0)
 COPD 1783 (24.9)
 Diabetes 2507 (35.0)
 Previous myocardial infarction 958 (13.4)
 Congestive heart failure 417 (5.8)
 Coronary artery disease 3104 (43.4)
 Chronic kidney disease 575 (8.0)
 End-stage renal disease 92 (1.3)
Hospital characteristics
 Location
  Rural 907 (12.7)
  Urban 6247 (87.3)
 Bed size
  <300 1836 (25.7)
  300–599 3769 (52.7)
  ≥600 1549 (21.7)
 Teaching hospital 3269 (45.7)
 Region
  New England 257 (3.6)
  Mid-Atlantic 665 (9.2)
  South Atlantic 2266 (31.7)
  East North Central 1021 (14.3)
  East South Central 685 (9.6)
  West North Central 437 (6.1)
  West South Central 864 (12.1)
  Mountain 240 (3.6)
  Pacific 719 (10.1)

COPD,Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; IQR,interquartile range.

Frequency of postoperative complications.

In-hospital complications occurred in 610 patients (8.5%) overall (Table II). Acute kidney injury was the most common complication, occurring in 217 patients (3.0%). Wound complications occurred in 164 patients (2.3%), most related to postoperative bleeding at the surgical site (n = 142; 2.0%). MACE occurred in 1.0% of patients, including 41 acute myocardial infarctions (0.6%), 18 strokes (0.3%), 4 transient ischemic attacks (0.1%), and 18 in-hospital deaths (0.3%). MALE occurred in 2.8% of the patients, including operative bypass revisions in 176 patients (2.5%), lower extremity endovascular interventions in 22 patients (0.3%), and major amputations in 7 patients (0.1%).

Table II.

Frequency of postoperative complications (2009–2015)

Outcome Total, No. (%)
LOS, days
 Median 3
 IQR 2–4
Any complication 610 (8.5)
Acute kidney injury 217 (3.0)
New dialysis 76 (1.1)
Wound complication 164 (2.3)
 Surgical site infection 16 (0.2)
 Wound dehiscence 11 (0.2)
 Bleeding/hematoma 142 (2.0)
MACE 71 (1.0)
 Acute myocardial infarction 41 (0.6)
 Transient ischemic attack 4 (0.1)
 Stroke 18 (0.3)
 Death 18 (0.3)
MALE 203 (2.8)
 Major amputation 7 (0.1)
 Reoperation 176 (2.5)
 Endovascular intervention 22 (0.3)

IQR, Interquartile range; LOS, length of stay; MACE, major adverse cardiac events; MALE, major adverse limb events.

Estimated overall hospital costs.

The median crude total hospital cost for elective LEB performed for claudication was $11,783 (IQR, $8911-$15,767), including $5412 (IQR, $3853-$7700) in fixed costs and $6196 (IQR, $4544-$8526) in variable costs (Table III). The largest proportion of hospital costs was attributable to operating room costs (median, $4474; IQR, $3162-$6407), followed by room and board ($2835; IQR, $1784-$4330) and supply costs ($2153; IQR, $1184-$3576).

Table III.

Estimated total and subcategories of in-hospital costs (2009–2015)

Cost type Median USD (IQR)
Total cost $11,783 ($8911-$15,767)
Total fixed cost $5412 ($3853-$7700)
Total variable cost $6196 ($4544-$8526)
Room and board cost
 Total $2835 ($1784-$4330)
 Fixed $1426 ($831-$2312)
 Variable $1332 ($823-$2118)
Operation room cost
 Total $4474 ($3162-$6407)
 Fixed $2384 ($1526-$3530)
 Variable $1955 ($1287-$2968)
Supply cost
 Total $2153 ($1184-$3576)
 Fixed $553 ($221-$1065)
 Variable $1473 ($760-$2614)
Laboratory test cost
 Total $254 ($136-$492)
 Fixed $109 ($54-$217)
 Variable $134 ($67-$270)
Pharmacy cost
 Total $559 ($358-$918)
 Fixed $207 ($114-$363)
 Variable $342 ($206-$548)
Other costs
 Total $444 ($202-$976)
 Fixed $221 ($96-$501)
 Variable $211 ($90-$457)

IQR, Interquartile range; USD, U.S. dollars.

Association of postoperative complications with hospital costs.

The estimated in-hospital costs for elective LEB varied significantly for patients with vs without complications (Table IV). Postoperative MACE was associated with an estimated $10,485 increase in hospital costs (95% confidence interval [CI], $6529-$14,441), followed by wound complications ($8984; 95% CI, $6773-$11,195), acute kidney injury ($6719; 95% CI, $4985-$8452), and MALE ($6183; 95% CI, $4603-$7762). The relative increase in hospital costs for any postoperative complication ranged from 46% (MALE) to 78% (MACE) greater than baseline (Table IV) and was substantially greater than the relative cost variation associated with any baseline patient demographic variable (relative increase, 1%−8%), comorbidity (relative increase, 5%−16%), provider region (relative increase, 4%−29%), or year of operation (relative increase, 3%−8%; Supplementary Table, online only).

Table IV.

Predicted, incremental, and relative in-hospital costs (USD) associated with postoperative complications (2009–2015)

Complication Predicted cost, $ (95% CI) Incremental cost, $ (95% CI) Relative increase, 95% CI P value
Acute kidney injury <.001
 No $13,329 ($13,161-$13,496) - -
 Yes $20,048 ($18,327-$21,769) $6719 ($4985-$8452) 1.50 (1.38–1.64)
Wound complication <.001
 No $13,344 ($13,178-$13,510) - -
 Yes $22,328 ($20,121-$24,536) $8984 ($6773-$11,195) 1.67 (1.51–1.85)
MALE <.001
 No $13,396 ($13,225-$13,566) - -
 Yes $19,578 ($18,004-$21,153) $6183 ($4603-$7762) 1.46 (1.35–1.58)
MACE <.001
 No $13,438 ($13,271-$13,606) - -
 Yes $23,923 ($19,973-$27,874) $10,485 ($6529-$14,441) 1.78 (1.51–2.1)

CI, Confidence interval; MACE, major adverse cardiac events; MALE, major adverse limb events; USD, U.S. dollars.

DISCUSSION

An increasing number of lower extremity revascularizations have been performed for claudication in the United States, despite multiple society recommendations against revascularization as primary management and a lack of apparent benefit in terms of long-term functional outcomes.2,4,5,10 In the present study, we sought to quantify the costs associated with postoperative complications after elective LEB for claudication. We found an overall in-hospital complication rate of 8.5%, and most complications were acute kidney injury and wound complications. The median in-hospital cost associated with LEB was just <$12,000 and had increased by 46% to 78% if a complication had occurred. Overall, our data have quantified the costs associated with elective LEB and highlighted the high cost burden associated with the development of postoperative complications.

LEB operations, in general, are known to have a high incidence of perioperative complication and readmission rates,14,15 resulting in an estimated $48.9 million burden in Medicare expenditures annually.14 Our in-hospital complication rate of 8.5% was comparable to the 7.4% in-hospital major adverse event rate reported in the NSQIP database for patients undergoing LEB for claudication.11 The individual complications rates in our study were also similar to those reported in the NSQIP, including MALE (2.8% vs 3.2%) and MACE (1.0% vs 1.7%). These complication rates were also consistent across multiple other databases, including analyses of institutional databases18,19 and the Vascular Quality Initiative.20 It is encouraging that the major complication rate associated with elective LEB has been consistently <10%. However, the serious nature of the reported adverse cardiac, kidney, and limb events is significant, given that claudication can usually be managed effectively without invasive intervention.10

The severity of the complications we have reported is reflected by their associated cost burdens. The baseline crude hospital cost for an uncomplicated LEB procedure reported in the PHD was $11,783, similar to previous reported studies.21 The increases in cost associated with each complication were significant, especially for MALE ($6183, a 46% relative increase from the baseline cost) and MACE ($10,485, a 78% relative increase from the baseline cost). Considering that ∼40,757 LEBs are performed annually among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States, of which ∼26% are performed for claudication,14 the cumulative cost to Medicare associated with in-hospital MALE and MACE after elective LEB for claudication would be $3.8 million annually. When combined with the previously reported costs of readmissions for posthospitalization complications,14,22 LEB for claudication is associated with nearly $9 million in unnecessary healthcare costs annually. Together, these data emphasize that surgeons must carefully consider the risks and benefits of revascularization for a pathology that can often be managed medically with good outcomes and amputation-free survival.3,10

In addition to the costs associated with in-hospital complications after LEB, we have described the costs associated with individual patient comorbidities. Patients who had undergone LEB with preexisting congestive heart failure and chronic kidney disease were associated with significantly greater LEB costs ($2114 and $1395, respectively) than those without such comorbidities. However, the costs associated with what many surgeons would consider major comorbidities were substantially lower than the costs associated with the development of a postoperative complication. The relative increase in costs for any comorbidity has been, at most, 16%. In contrast, the relative increase in costs for a complication has been as high as 78%. These data suggest that, although major patient comorbidities should clearly be factored into the risk stratification process when offering elective revascularization, the cost implications of a complication pose a much larger problem for the burden of care after LEB. A formal cost-benefit analysis might be helpful to risk stratify patients with claudication for LEB surgery in the future.

When considering methods to decrease the incidence of postoperative complications among patients with claudication, the most obvious answer would be to avoid surgery altogether. The mainstays of treatment of claudication are medical management, smoking cessation, and exercise. Recent investigations comparing the efficacy of revascularization vs supervised exercise therapy for the treatment of intermittent claudication noted no functional or quality of life advantages for patients undergoing endovascular23 or open10 revascularization at 18 months and 5 years, respectively. Current tobacco use was prevalent in 36.7% of patients in our study. Active smoking at LEB for claudication has been associated with decreased long-term patency and overall survival,24 suggesting that elective open revascularization in these patients should receive additional scrutiny. It is concerning that more than one third of the patients in our study were active smokers, highlighting the substantial room for improvement present in the medical management of claudication.25

Most of the limitations in our study were related to the administrative nature of the data. The PHD uses ICD-9 codes to identify both diagnoses and procedures, introducing the possibility of coding errors. Some patients with a code indicating claudication might have undergone LEB for nonatherosclerotic etiologies. Also, the PHD is not a surgical- or vascular-focused database and lacks the granularity necessary to understand patients’ disease severity, symptoms, bypass configuration, or conduit used. Also, no data are available regarding the use of supervised exercise therapy or other best medical practices before intervention. Finally, we did not have information on the severity of the complications reported. However, the PHD does capture ∼20% of all inpatient hospitalizations in the United States and a representative sample of insurance carriers. The PHD is also unique in its reporting of specific cost data not available from most other national databases. Therefore, although the indications and technical details associated with surgery were not available, our study is unique in its ability to quantify the overall and complication-specific costs associated with LEB for claudication and its complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative complications after elective LEB for claudication are not uncommon, occurring in 8.5% of patients during the index hospitalization. These complications are a significant source of healthcare expenditure, increasing the costs of the hospital stay by 46% (MALE) and 78% (MACE) greater than baseline. The financial burden associated with postoperative complications supports the notion that LEB should be used sparingly for the treatment of claudication in accordance with established professional society guidelines. Diligent patient selection is warranted to minimize the occurrence of complications and unnecessary healthcare expenditures.

Supplementary Material

1

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS.

  • Type of Research: National database retrospective cohort study

  • Key Findings: Within the Premier Healthcare Database (Premier Inc, Charlotte, NC), an analysis of 7154 lower extremity bypasses performed for claudication yielded an 8.5% postoperative complication rate with an overall median crude hospital cost of $11,783 (interquartile range, $8911-$15,767) per patient. The incremental increase in cost associated with a postoperative complication was significant, ranging from $6183 (95% confidence interval, $4604-$7762) for major adverse limb events to $10,485 (95% confidence interval, $6529-$14,441) for major adverse cardiac events after risk adjustment.

  • Take Home Message: Complications after elective lower extremity bypass for claudication are not uncommon and are associated with a significant increase in in-hospital costs of 46% to 78%.

Footnotes

Author conflict of interest: none.

Additional material for this article may be found online at www.jvascsurg.org.

The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to disclose per the JVS policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any manuscript for which they may have a conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Harris KA, Fowkes FG, et al. Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg 2007;45(Suppl S):S5–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Conte MS, Pomposelli FB, Clair DG, Geraghty PJ, McKinsey JF, Mills JL, et al. Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines for atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the lower extremities: management of asymptomatic disease and claudication. J Vasc Surg 2015;61(Suppl): 2S-41S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Malgor RD, Alahdab F, Elraiyah TA, Rizvi AZ, Lane MA, Prokop LJ, et al. A systematic review of treatment of intermittent claudication of the lower extremities. J Vasc Surg 2015;61(Suppl):54S-73S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gerhard-Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, Barshes NR, Corriere MA, Drachman DE, et al. 2016 AHA/ACC guideline on the management of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease: executive summary. Circulation 2017;135:e686–725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Simons JP, Schanzer A, Nolan BW, Stone DH, Kalish JA, Cronenwett JL, et al. Outcomes and practice patterns in patients undergoing lower extremity bypass. J Vasc Surg 2012;55:1629–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Goodney PP, Beck AW, Nagle J, Welch HG, Zwolak RM. National trends in lower extremity bypass surgery, endovascular interventions and major amputations. J Vasc Surg 2009;50:54–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Soden PA, Zettervall SL, Shean KE, Vouyouka AG, Goodney PP, Mills JL, et al. Regional variation in outcomes for lower extremity vascular disease in the Vascular Quality Initiative. J Vasc Surg 2017;66:810–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Eugster T, Marti R, Gurke L, Stierli P. Ten years after arterial bypass surgery for claudication: venous bypass is the primary procedure for TASC C and D lesions. World J Surg 2011;35: 2328–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Byrne J, Darling RC III, Chang BB, Paty PS, Kreienberg PB, Lloyd WE, et al. Infrainguinal arterial reconstruction for claudication: is it worth the risk? An analysis of 409 procedures. J Vasc Surg 1999;29:259–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Djerf H, Millinger J, Falkenberg M, Jivegard L, Svensson M, Nordanstig J. Absence of long-term benefit of revascularization in patients with intermittent claudication: five-year results from the IRONIC randomized trial. Circ Interv 2020;13:e008450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liang P, Li C, O’Donnell TFX, Lo RC, Soden PA, Swerdlow NJ, et al. In-hospital versus postdischarge major adverse events within 30 days following lower extremity revascularization. J Vasc Surg 2019;69:482–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Osborne Z, Hanson K, Brooke BS, Schermerhorn M, Henke P, Faizer R, et al. Variation in transfusion practices and the association with perioperative adverse events in patients undergoing open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and lower extremity arterial bypass in the Vascular Quality Initiative. Ann Vasc Surg 2018;46:1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Alshaikh HN, Hicks CW, DiBrito SR, Zarkowsky DS, Siracuse JJ, Malas MB. Elective infrainguinal lower extremity bypass for claudication is associated with high postoperative intensive care utilization. J Vasc Surg 2019;69: 1863–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lawson EH, Hall BL, Louie R, Ettner SL, Zingmond DS, Han L, et al. Association between occurrence of a postoperative complication and readmission: implications for quality improvement and cost savings. Ann Surg 2013;258:10–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Healy MA, Mullard AJ, Campbell DA Jr, Dimick JB. Hospital and payer costs associated with surgical complications. JAMA Surg 2016;151:823–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Premier Applied Sciences Research Division. Premier Inc. Premier Healthcare Database: Data that Informs. Available at: https://products.premierinc.com/downloads/PremierHealthcareDatabaseWhitepaper.pdf. Accessed May 20, 2020.
  • 17.Bureau of Labor Statistics. CPI Inflation Calculator. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm. Accessed April 14, 2020.
  • 18.Krafcik BM, Komshian S, Lu K, Roberts L, Farber A, Kalish JA, et al. Short- and long-term readmission rates after infrainguinal bypass in a safety net hospital are higher than expected. J Vasc Surg 2017;66:1786–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Baril DT, Patel VI, Judelson DR, Goodney PP, McPhee JT, Hevelone ND, et al. Outcomes of lower extremity bypass performed for acute limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2013;58: 949–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Flores E, Lewinger JP, Rowe VL, Woo K, Weaver FA, Shavelle D, et al. Increased risk of mortality after lower extremity bypass in individuals with acute kidney injury in the Vascular Quality Initiative. J Vasc Surg 2017;65: 1055–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nejim BJ, Wang S, Arhuidese I, Obeid T, Alshaikh HN, Aridi HD, et al. Regional variation in the cost of infrainguinal lower extremity bypass surgery in the United States. J Vasc Surg 2018;67:1170–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jones CE, Richman JS, Chu DI, Gullick AA, Pearce BJ, Morris MS. Readmission rates after lower extremity bypass vary significantly by surgical indication. J Vasc Surg 2016;64: 458–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Murphy TP, Cutlip DE, Regensteiner JG, Mohler ER III, Cohen DJ, Reynolds MR, et al. Supervised exercise, stent revascularization, or medical therapy for claudication due to aortoiliac peripheral artery disease: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:999–1009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jones DW, Goodney PP, Eldrup-Jorgensen J, Schermerhorn ML, Siracuse JJ, Kang J, et al. Active smoking in claudicants undergoing lower extremity bypass predicts decreased graft patency and worse overall survival. J Vasc Surg 2018;68:796–806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ochoa Chaar CI, Gholitabar N, Detrani M, Jorshery DS, Kim TI, Zhuo H, et al. Variations in the management of claudication in a tertiary care center. Ann Vasc Surg 2020;67:395–402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES