Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 11;11:5792. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84973-5

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Forest plot of consistency between WFO (only ‘Recommended’) and MDT for patients with various cancers. Treatment was considered concordant if the delivered treatment was rated as ‘Recommended’ by WFO and discordant if the delivered treatment was rated as other options by WFO or was physician’s choice (not included in WFO). Overall concordance of various cancers in stages I–III and IV (A). Concordance of various estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER+/PR+vs. ER−, PR−) in breast cancer (B). Concordance of various performance status (ECOG 0 vs. ECOG 1–2) in colorectal cancer (C). Concordance of various age (< 70-year-old vs. older) in colorectal cancer (D). Concordance of various pathological types (small cell vs. non-small cell) in lung cancer (E).