Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 15;13(3):174–184. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i3.174

Table 2.

Comparison of baseline clinicopathologic characteristics between grasping forceps assisted endoscopic resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection groups for small lesions (defined as ≤ 10 mm in diameter)


GF-ER
ESD
P value
Age, yr
Median (IQR) 67.5 (54-80) 75.5 (66-79) 0.39
Sex, n
Male 4 (66.7) 16 (80.0) 0.60
Female 2 (33.3) 4 (20.0)
Morphology, n (%)
Flat or depressed 4 (57.1) 16 (80.0) 0.33
Elevated 3 (42.9) 4 (20.0)
Ulceration, n (%)
Presence 0 (0) 1 (5.0) 1.0
Absence 7 (100) 19 (95.0)
Tumor size, mm
Median (IQR) 6.0 (4-8) 6.5 (5-9) 0.45
Tumor depth, n (%)
Mucosa 4 (57.1) 18 (90.0) 0.09
Submucosa 3 (42.9) 2 (10.0)
Histology, n (%)
Differentiated 7 (100) 17 (85.0) 1.0
Undifferentiated 0 (0) 3 (15.0)

P values were calculated using Fisher’s exact test for categorical data and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous data. GF-ER: Grasping forceps assisted endoscopic resection; ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; IQR: Interquartile range.