Table 4.
Comparison of treatment outcomes for small lesions (defined as ≤ 10 mm in diameter) between grasping forceps assisted endoscopic resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection groups
|
|
GF-ER
|
ESD
|
P
value
|
| Procedure time, min | |||
| Median (IQR) | 4.0 (3.0-5.0) | 35.0 (25-75) | < 0.01 |
| En bloc resection, n (%) | 7 (100) | 20 (100) | 1.0 |
| R0 resection, n (%) | 7 (100) | 20 (100) | 1.0 |
| Curative resection, n (%) | 7 (100) | 19 (95.0) | 1.0 |
| Perforation, n (%) | 0 (0) | 1 (5.0) | 1.0 |
| Delayed bleeding, n (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1.0 |
P values were calculated using Fisher’s exact test for categorical data and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous data. GF-ER: Grasping forceps assisted endoscopic resection; ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; IQR: Interquartile range.