Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 15;13(3):174–184. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i3.174

Table 4.

Comparison of treatment outcomes for small lesions (defined as ≤ 10 mm in diameter) between grasping forceps assisted endoscopic resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection groups


GF-ER
ESD
P value
Procedure time, min
Median (IQR) 4.0 (3.0-5.0) 35.0 (25-75) < 0.01
En bloc resection, n (%) 7 (100) 20 (100) 1.0
R0 resection, n (%) 7 (100) 20 (100) 1.0
Curative resection, n (%) 7 (100) 19 (95.0) 1.0
Perforation, n (%) 0 (0) 1 (5.0) 1.0
Delayed bleeding, n (%) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1.0

P values were calculated using Fisher’s exact test for categorical data and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous data. GF-ER: Grasping forceps assisted endoscopic resection; ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; IQR: Interquartile range.