Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 15;16(10):1693–1699. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.8646

Table 3.

Sleep efficiency mixed-effects beta model results.

95% CI for OR
Coefficient SE OR Lower Upper P Value
COPD vs no COPD −.25 .11 .78 .62 .97 .024
Linear time (0 = baseline) −.03 .03 .97 .92 1.03 .347
Age .01 .00 1.01 1.00 1.02 .009
Male vs female .21 .10 1.23 1.01 1.49 .037
Race
 White vs other .30 .28 1.35 .78 2.33 .282
 Black vs other .23 .27 1.26 .75 2.12 .390
 White vs Black .07 .12 1.07 .85 1.35 .552
BMI .00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.01 .473
Prior hospitalization .09 .11 1.10 .88 1.36 .405
CHF −.05 .14 .95 .72 1.26 .742
ESRD .17 .16 1.19 .86 1.64 .291
Diabetes −.02 .11 .98 .79 1.22 0.881
Intercept −.17 .36

COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. BMI = body mass index. CHF = congestive heart failure, CI, confidence interval, ESRD = end stage renal disease, OR, odds ratio, SE, standard error.

Random intercept variance = 0.44, SE = 0.07. Scale = 6.84, SE = 0.62. Sleep efficiency was modeled as a proportion with 0 = no sleep efficiency and 1 = perfect sleep efficiency. In a beta model, we are predicting the probability of the outcome coded 1 (ie, perfect sleep efficiency); fixed effects are interpreted similarly to logistic regression. The reference category for the fixed effect for any categorical predictor is identified following the “vs” For example, the odds of reporting normal sleep efficiency were 22% lower for patients with a COPD diagnosis relative to those with no COPD diagnosis (ie, [1–0.78]*100).