Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Stat Assoc. 2019 Oct 29;115(532):1946–1959. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2019.1671200

Table 5.

Estimates of Log Hazard Ratios, With Standard Error Estimates in Parentheses, from the Proportional Hazards Regression Analysis of the National Wilms’ Tumor Study

Histological assessment Tumor stage
n2 Design Central Local II III IV Age
400 CC 1.573 (0.359) 0.114 (0.291) 0.682 (0.125) 0.793 (0.125) 1.067 (0.141) 0.078 (0.015)
SCC 1.579 (0.322) 0.068 (0.297) 0.677 (0.127) 0.790 (0.127) 1.092 (0.143) 0.078 (0.015)
ODS 1.882 (0.382) −0.127 (0.302) 0.692 (0.127) 0.795 (0.128) 1.083 (0.145) 0.080 (0.015)
YDS 2.210 (0.269) −0.034 (0.229) 0.704 (0.129) 0.835 (0.130) 1.113 (0.147) 0.080 (0.015)
OPT 1.549 (0.260) 0161 (0.258) 0.666 (0.124) 0.781 (0.123) 1.151 (0.139) 0.077 (0.015)
1142 CC 1.513 (0.219) 0.128 (0.199) 0.676 (0.131) 0.789 (0.131) 1.062 (0.146) 0.077 (0.015)
SCC 1.578 (0.193) 0.083 (0.195) 0.665 (0.113) 0.788 (0.112) 1.134 (0.132) 0.077 (0.015)
NCC 1.510 (0.226) 0.133 (0.198) 0.675 (0.132) 0.789 (0.132) 1.063 (0.147) 0.077 (0.015)
CM 1.585 (0.192) 0.077 (0.200) 0.666 (0.117) 0.789 (0.117) 1.134 (0.159) 0.077 (0.016)
YDS 1.947 (0.202) −0.109 (0.184) 0.699 (0.124) 0.838 (0.124) 1.110 (0.140) 0.072 (0.015)
OPT 1.424 (0.185) 0.228 (0.181) 0.667 (0.111) 0.777 (0.111) 1.135 (0.141) 0.075 (0.015)
4028 FC 1.444 (0.135) 0.203 (0.144) 0.662 (0.122) 0.802 (0.121) 1.137 (0.135) 0.071 (0.015)

NOTE: CC, SCC, ODS, YDS, OPT, NCC, CM, and FC denote case-cohort sampling, stratified case-cohort sampling, general failure-time outcome-dependent sampling, Y-dependent sampling, optimal design, nested case-control sampling, counter-matching, and full-cohort, respectively. Estimates of log hazard ratios and standard errors under the CC, SCC, ODS, NCC, and CM designs are averaged over 1000 replicates.