Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 10;41(3):BSR20203638. doi: 10.1042/BSR20203638

Table 3. Subgroup and sensitivity analysis of viral load in preclinical studies.

Total number of studies Total sample size Subgroup analysis Sensitivity analysis
Exp. Ctr. SMD (95% CI) I2 P SMD (95% CI) I2 P
Effect estimates
  SEM 10 132 121 −1.14 (−1.47, −0.82) 22% 0.24 −1.05 (−1.33, −1.77) 0% 0.73
  SD 19 461 275 −1.26 (−1.63, −0.88) 79% <0.001 −1.16 (−1.51, −0.80) 75% <0.001
Viral type
  H1N1 15 283 181 −1.54 (−1.98, −1.10) 73% <0.001 −1.44 (−1.86, −1.01) 69% <0.001
  Others 4 208 104 −0.42 (−0.66, −0.18) 0% 0.53 - - -
Microbial agents
  Prebiotics 4 53 43 −2.39 (−4.16, −0.61) 90% <0.001 −3.07 (−3.83, −2.30) 0% 0.4
  Probiotics 15 438 242 −1.00 (−1.46, −0.54) 84% <0.001 −0.86 (−1.25, −0.46) 79% <0.001

Data were analyzed using a random-effects model. We analyzed the Effect estimates group for the included preclinical studies regarding viral load. We analyzed the viral type and microbial agent groups in the preclinical studies using SD as the effect estimate. Abbreviations: Ctr, control group; Exp, experimental group.