Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 15;76:e2258. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2258

Table 2. Results of the subgroup analysis on prognostic significance of GRNI in HF.

Analysis Categories No of Studies (n) Patients (n) Model HR (95%CI) Z p I2 (%) ph
Overall 9 7659 Random 1.59 (1.37, 1.85) 5.96 0.00 93.40 0.00
Study region Western country 3 5206 Random 2.78 (1.86, 4.17) 4.95 0.00 58.70 0.08
Eastern country 6 2453 Random 1.21 (1.09, 1.34) 3.58 0.00 85.80 0.00
Sample size >500 3 6337 Random 2.24 (1.20, 4.18) 2.52 0.01 95.00 0.00
≤500 6 1332 Random 1.13 (1.03, 1.24) 2.57 0.01 76.30 0.00
Age >75 years 4 1108 Random 1.91 (1.07, 3.38) 2.21 0.02 79.50 0.00
≤75 years 5 6551 Random 1.82 (1.21, 2.73) 2.89 0.00 97.00 0.00
Follow-up duration >2 years 5 6632 Random 2.23 (1.35, 3.68) 3.14 0.00 90.60 0.00
≤2 years 4 1027 Random 1.09 (1.02, 1.17) 2.48 0.01 72.10 0.01
HF type Acute HF 2 704 Random 1.07 (1.05, 1.09) 6.24 0.00 0.00 0.36
HFpEF 3 1939 Random 2.46 (1.88, 3.21) 6.61 0.00 0.00 0.81
Mixed 4 5106 Random 2.10 (1.07, 4.12) 2.15 0.03 91.70 0.00

GRNI geriatric nutritional risk index; HF heart failure; HFpEF heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HR hazard ratios; CI confidence interval; ph p value of heterogeneity.