Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar;320:70–78. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.01.018

Table 2.

Association of B2M with risk for CVD, CVD mortality, and all-cause mortality by recorded study level characteristics.

Subgroup CVD
CVD mortality
All-cause mortality
No of studiesa No of cases RR (95%CI) I2 (%) pmeta-regression No of studies No of cases RR (95%CI) I2 (%) pmeta-regression No of studies No of cases RR (95%CI) I2 (%) pmeta-regression
All studies 8 2523 1.71 (1.37, 2.13) 73.5 8 1866 2.29 (1.51, 3.49) 80.0 10 6165 2.51 (1.94, 3.26) 83.7
Study design
Retrospective 1 27 65.84 (6.33, 684.54) 0.034 1 114 3.34 (2.41, 4.63) 0.457 2 481 5.79 (1.06, 31.65) 58.5 0.315
Prospective 7 2496 1.66 (1.39, 1.99) 64.7 7 1752 2.13 (1.34, 3.37) 76.4 8 5684 2.36 (1.80, 3.09) 84.8
Population
General population 2 1728 1.82 (1.54, 2.14) 31.2 0.954 2 1246 3.03 (2.23, 4.11) 0 0.407 3 4572 2.00 (1.68, 2.39) 65.3 0.263
Renal disease patients 6 795 1.75 (1.13, 2.72) 76.2 6 620 2.04 (1.16, 3.59) 81.9 7 1593 2.94 (1.96, 4.39) 72.0
Geographical location
America 4 2356 1.75 (1.49, 2.05) 63.2 0.520 4 1675 2.47 (1.45, 4.20) 89.1 0.227 5 5677 2.56 (1.87, 3.49) 90.6 0.332
Asia 3 118 2.70 (0.37, 19.49) 84.0 3 167 1.51 (0.87.2.60) 3.3 4 444 2.04 (1.16, 3.61) 57.8
Europe 1 49 2.59 (1.19, 5.66) 1 24 8.02 (2.13, 30.23) 1 44 6.61 (2.53, 17.28)
Study quality (NOS)
<8 3 140 1.30 (0.59, 2.83) 62.8 0.359 1 24 8.02 (2.13, 30.23) 0.155 1 44 6.61 (2.53, 17.28) 0.174
≧ 8 5 2383 1.83 (1.46, 2.28) 77.1 7 1842 2.11 (1.39, 3.21) 80.7 9 6121 2.39 (1.84, 3.09) 83.9
Proportion of female participants
<50% 5 459 2.06 (0.96, 4.42) 80.5 0.885 5 305 2.36 (1.30, 4.28) 62.7 0.899 8 3018 2.70 (1.80, 4.03) 87.0 0.660
≧50% 3 2064 1.69 (1.44, 1.98) 66.2 3 1561 2.23 (1.17, 4.23) 88.9 2 3147 2.18 (1.86, 2.56) 3.1
Adjust for renal markers
No 6 2204 1.59 (1.31, 1.92) 65.5 0.267 4 333 2.34 (1.09, 5.02) 69.4 0.939 4 1148 2.16 (1.36, 3.43) 66.1 0.498
Yes 2 319 9.91 (0.37, 264.28) 87.2 4 1533 2.26 (1.28, 3.98) 87.1 6 5017 2.78 (1.90, 4.08) 89.2

B2M: Beta-2-microglobulin; CI: Confidence Interval; CVD: Cardiovascular disease; NOS: Newcastle-Ottowa Scale; RR: Relative Risk.

a

Matsushita et al. study [20] was counted twice for CVD because estimates were provided for two populations, respectively.