Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 16;10(1):e017225. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017225

Table 4.

Association Between Baseline Serum suPAR Concentration and CKD Progression

Variable CKD Progression, %* Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
HR (95% CI) P Value HR (95% CI) P Value HR (95% CI) P Value HR (95% CI) P Value
suPAR 36.1 1.73 (1.48–2.03) <0.001 1.80 (1.54–2.12) <0.001 1.77 (1.50–2.08) <0.001 1.29 (1.02–1.62) 0.03
Tertile of suPAR
Tertile 1 15.2 Reference
Tertile 2 27.1 1.58 (1.12–2.24) 0.01 1.62 (1.14–2.29) 0.01 1.58 (1.12–2.24) 0.01 1.30 (0.89–1.90) 0.18
Tertile 3 48.8 3.13 (2.27–4.32) <0.001 3.34 (2.41–4.63) <0.001 3.25 (2.34–4.52) <0.001 2.09 (1.37–3.21) 0.001

Model 1: unadjusted. Model 2: adjusted for demographic factors (age, sex, smoking status, and body mass index). Model 3: adjusted for model 2+comorbidities (history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease). Model 4: adjusted for model 3+laboratory tests (hemoglobin, total cholesterol, and CRP [C‐reactive protein]), kidney measures (estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria), and 24‐hour systolic blood pressure. CKD indicates chronic kidney disease; HR, hazard ratio; and suPAR, soluble urokinase‐type plasminogen activator receptor.

*

P for trend <0.001.

HR per 1 increase of log‐transformed baseline suPAR.