Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 17;76(4):661–670. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa009

Table 5.

CACE Model Estimates and Effect Sizes by Each Condition at 20th, 40th, and 60th, Percentile of Exposure at 12 and 24 Months in Women

CACE comparison Condition 20th percentile of exposure 40th percentile of exposure 60th percentile of exposure
Baseline—12 months Neutral 0.39 (0.20) g = 0.38 (−0.05–0.81) 0.49 (0.22) g = 0.23 (−0.10–0.57) 0.39 (0.24) g = 0.37 (0.04–0.70)
Incongruent 0.17 (0.31) g = 0.09 (−0.35–0.51) 0.16 (0.40) g = 0.16 (−0.18–0.49) −0.13 (0.63) g = 0.21 (−0.12–0.54)
Baseline—24 months Neutral −0.21 (0.37) g = 0.27 (−0.16–0.69) 0.40 (0.34) g = 0.22 (−0.11–0.55) 0.52 (0.41) g = 0.24 (−0.09–0.57)
Incongruent −0.31 (0.34) g = −0.12 (−0.55−0.30) −0.53 (0.48) g = 0.19 (−0.14–0.53) −1.12 (1.55) g = 0.24 (−0.09–0.57)

Note: Top row of values are unstandardized CACE estimates (SE in parentheses). Negative CACE values indicate reductions in ISD (i.e., improvements in behavioral performance). g = Hedges’ g (standardized mean difference between compliers and noncompliers at each percentile level). Values in parentheses represent 95% confidence intervals. Positive effect sizes indicate greater improvement in the compliers.

*p < .01.