Table 4.
Experience with DHIS2 among intervention participants at endline (n = 62)
| % of community health worker reporting | n (%) |
|---|---|
| Having been trained on DHIS2 app |
62 (100.0) |
| Currently using tablet/smartphone to submit reports |
62 (100.0) |
| Having been supervised about data collection using DHIS2 app |
62 (100.0) |
| Transmitting data on time last month |
62 (100.0) |
| Finding it easy to report data using tablet |
56 (90.3) |
| Comfortable/confident in ability to use DHIS2 tracker app to report health data from their community |
55 (88.7) |
| Comfortable/confident in ability to use tablet to record new client health data |
54 (87.1) |
| Able to access and review data on tablet after it’s submitted |
52 (83.9) |
| Comfortable/confident in ability to use tablet to access existing health records |
49 (79.0) |
| Entered all of last month’s data in tablet |
29 (46.8) |
|
Preferred method for data reporting: | |
| Tablet/smartphone |
57 (91.9) |
| Both (tablet and paper) |
5 (8.1) |
| Paper tools |
0 (0.0) |
|
Change in workload since starting to use tablet to collect data:* | |
| Increased |
42 (67.7) |
| Decreased |
20 (32.3) |
|
Experience difficulties in reporting mobile health data: | |
| Poor network connectivity |
54 (87.1) |
| No phone/data credit |
51 (82.3) |
| Battery not charged |
43 (69.4) |
| Tablet damaged or lost | 4 (6.5) |
DHIS2 – District Health Information System
*No participants responded that their workload stayed the same.