Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 10;11:07007. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.07007

Table 3.

Observed vs self-reported communications

Self-reported communication items* N = 949 % Observed communication items† N = 949 %
Did the FWA greet you in a friendly way?
935
99
Did the FWA greet the client?
769
81
Did the FWA introduce her/himself? (if 1st meeting)
836
88
Did the FWA introduce herself?
876
92
Did the FWA explain the purpose of the visit?
644
68
Did the FWA explain or ask the purpose of visit?
623
66
Was the information given to you by the FWA easy to understand?
943
99
Did the FWA use simple words in local language?
942
99
Did the FWA demonstrate, give examples, and/or use visual aids (as appropriate) while communicating
163
17
Did the FWA use visual aids?
25
3
Did you ask the FWA questions?
394
42
Did the FWA encourage the client if she has any questions?
425
45
Did the FWA listen and watch carefully when the client talks?
906
95
Did the FWA use appropriate ‘non-verbal’ body language (check for nodding, eye contact, leaning forward or backwards, facial expressions etc.)?
904
95
Did the FWA answer your questions clearly?
385
97
Did the FWA answer questions simply?
459
97
Summary score – mean (SD) 3.62 (1.27)
Summary score – mean (SD) 6.42 (1.78)

FWA – family welfare assistant, SD – standard deviation

*Client survey.

†Observation of service provision.