Table 1.
Cultivar | In this Study (LWB) | Previous Study | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Days after Inoculation | AUDPC b | rAUDPC(%) c | Phenotype d | Root-Drench Phenotype e,f | ||||
0 | 7 | 10 | 15 | |||||
Gangryeokjosenggeon | 0 a | 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 9.4 bc g | 24.1 | R | R e |
PR Cheongyang | 0 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 9.7 bc | 24.9 | R | MR e |
Ilsongjung | 0 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.9 | 8.3 c | 21.3 | R | MR e |
PR Jangwongeubje | 0 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 10.2 bc | 26.0 | R | S e |
Muhanjilju | 0 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 8.2 c | 20.9 | R | S e,f/MR f/R f |
Dokyachungchung | 0 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 12.5 bc | 32.0 | MR | R e |
Meotjinsanai | 0 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 13.4 bc | 34.2 | MR | MR f/R f |
Nokgwang | 0 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 12.5 bc | 32.0 | MR | - |
PR Gukgadeapyo | 0 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 15.3 b | 39.3 | MR | S e |
Yeokganghongjanggun | 0 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 2.3 | 12.0 bc | 30.4 | MR | S e |
PR Daedeulbo | 0 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 3.1 | 15.6 b | 40.0 | S | S e |
Supermanidda | 0 | 2.9 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 39.0 a | 100 | S | S e |
‘MC4′ | 0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 3.5 d | 8.9 | R | R e |
‘Subicho’ | 0 | 2.6 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 38.5 a | 98.7 | S | S e |
a Disease severity index (DSI) was represented by a 0 to 4 rating scale. b The AUDPC was calculated based on DSI scores evaluated at 0, 7, 10, and 15 days after inoculation (dai). c Relative (r) AUDPC (%) of each cultivar to AUDPC of the ‘Suppermanidda’ that is most the susceptible cultivar. d DSI of <2 is considered resistant, 2 ≤ DSI < 3 is moderately resistant and susceptible was defined with DSI of ≥3. Each data point represents the mean DSI from three independent experiments. A total of 30 plants were analyzed for each cultivar. e Root-cut drench method by Hwang et al. (2017). f Root-dipping method by Lee et al. (2018). g Each value represents the mean disease index of values in the labeled with the same letter with each column are not significantly different in Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05.