Table 5.
Comparison between models predicting RMSSD. Note that smaller values of AIC indicate better fitting models.
| Tested Models | Variables | AIC | Delta AIC | Marginal R2 | χ2 | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 0 | Random effect of Participants | 1173 | ||||
| Model 1 | + Time | 1173 | 1.99 | 0.006 | 2.935 | 0.231 |
| Model 2 | + Type of touch | 1175 | −0.68 | 0.006 | 0.042 | 0.838 |
| Model 3 | + Interaction Time × Type of touch | 1170 | 10.95 | 0.024 | 9.400 | 0.009 |
| Model 4 | + Order of tactile stimulation | 1171 | 0.89 | 0.028 | 1.722 | 0.190 |
| Model 5 | + Interaction with Order | 1176 | 13.86 | 0.036 | 4.759 | 0.446 |