Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 8;21(2):231–240. doi: 10.1007/s40256-020-00436-8

Table 3.

Summary of findings

Potent P2Y12 oral inhibitors versus clopidogrel in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
Patients or population: Patients treated with oral anticoagulants for AF undergoing PCI
Intervention: Potent P2Y12 oral inhibitors (i.e. ticagrelor or prasugrel)
Comparison: Clopidogrel
Outcomes Relative risk (95% CI) Events in the potent P2Y12 arm (events/patients) Events in the clopidogrel arm (events/patients) No. of patients (no. of study) Certainty of evidence
Major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding 1.30 (1.06–1.59) 185/843 1500/9214 10,057 (4) Moderatea
MACE 1.02 (0.57–1.82) 82/732 671/7878 8610 (3) Lowb

AF atrial fibrillation, CI confidence interval, MACE major adverse cardiovascular events, PCI percutaneous coronary intervention

aInconsistency: wide CIs

bInconsistency: wide CIs; imprecision: heterogeneity and small sample size