Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 26;24(3):102240. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102240

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Performance of XGBoost model in predictions of detonation and stability properties of HEDMs as well as experimental validation

(A–J) (A) Predicted values of Qmax, error metrics, and experimental validation. (B) Distribution of Qmax residuals between XGBoost prediction and DFT calculation. (C) Predicted values of D, error metrics, and experimental validation. (D) Distribution of D residuals between XGBoost prediction and DFT calculation. (E) Predicted values of pC-J, error metrics, and experimental validation. (F) Distribution of pC-J residuals between XGBoost prediction and DFT calculation. (G) Predicted values of Td and their error metrics. (H) Distribution of residuals between XGBoost prediction and experimental measurement. (I) Predicted values of LE and their error metrics. (J) Distribution of residuals between XGBoost prediction and DFT calculation. Solid spheres of experimental data are for the densely pressed samples with ρ ≥ 95% ρmax, and the open circles are for those compounds with ρ < 95% ρmax. Residuals of all XGBoost predictions are shown in Figure S1.