Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 14;24(3):e25671. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25671

Table 2a.

Time to QFT conversion among previously QFT‐negative study participants, comparing APHIV to HIV‐youth (N = 380): crude and adjusted hazard ratios from Cox proportional hazards regression

Crude HR (95% CI) aHR (95% CI) 1
HIV infection: HIV positive versus HIV negative 0.65 (0.39 to 1.09)
Effects of time‐varying HIV viral suppression on relative Hazard of QFT conversion among HIV+ versus HIV− youth
HIV negative (reference) 1.00 1.00
HIV positive, viral load ≤40 copies/mL 0.75 (0.44 to 1.27) 0.92 (0.52 to 1.62)
HIV positive, viral load >40, <1000 copies/mL 0.59 (0.29 to 1.23) 0.75 (0.35 to 1.62)
HIV positive, viral load ≥1000 copies/mL 0.23 (0.07 to 0.79) 0.29 (0.08 to 1.00)
Male versus female sex 0.71 (0.46 to 1.11)
Age at study visit (time‐varying, per year increase) 0.92 (0.81 to 1.05) 0.86 (0.73 to 1.00)
Categories of age at study visit (time‐varying, in years)
<12 years (reference) 1.00
≥12, <14 years 1.55 (0.73 to 3.31)
≥14, <16 years 1.14 (0.52 to 2.52)
≥16 years 1.00 (0.39 to 2.56)
BMI categories (time‐varying)
Normal weight, ≥18, <25 kg/m2 (reference) 1.00
Underweight, <18 kg/m2 0.67 (0.41 to 1.10)
Overweight/obese, ≥25 kg/m2 0.87 (0.44 to 1.72)
Tanner staging at study visit (time‐varying)
Stage I (pre‐adolescent), reference 1.00 1.00
Stage II to IV (adolescent) 1.02 (0.56 to 1.84) 1.34 (0.71 to 2.52)
Stage V (mature) 1.46 (0.73 to 2.90) 2.40 (1.06 to 5.42)
Known TB contact at enrolment (yes vs. no) 1.78 (0.33 to 5.65)

aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; CD, cluster of differentiation; CI, confidence intervals; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HR, hazard ratio; QFT, interferon gamma release assay (QuantiFERON‐TB).

Bold indicates statistically significant values.

1

Multivariable model adjusted for all variables with adjusted estimates shown as well as baseline measures of relative poverty.