Table A2.
What is considered | How it affects the recommendation |
---|---|
High evidence | The higher the quality of evidence, the more likely is a strong recommendation |
Certainty about the balance of benefits vs. harms and burdens | The larger/smaller the difference between the desirable and undesirable consequences and the certainty around that difference, the more likely is a strong/weak recommendation |
Certainty in or similar values | The more certainty or similarity in values and preferences, the more likely is a strong recommendation |
Resource implications | The lower/higher the cost of an intervention than the alternative, the more likely is a strong/weak recommendation |
Availability and feasibility in LMICs | The less available, the more likely is a weak recommendation |
Affordability for LMICs | The less affordable, the more likely is a weak recommendation |
Safety of the intervention in LMICs | The less safe in an LMIC, the more likely is a weak recommendation |
Adapted from Ref. 1.
*In case of a strong recommendation, we use “we recommend…”; in case of a weak recommendation, we use “we suggest…”