Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 28;22(5):2439. doi: 10.3390/ijms22052439

Table 1.

Biomarker approach of damage-associated molecular patterns following ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke.

Author (Year) Marker Study Design Applications Outcome Results
Ren et al. [79] (2016) GFAP Case-control
(132 IS; 57 controls)
Diagnosis Stroke subtype GFAP discriminated IS from ICH within 4.5 h of symptoms onset (Se = 61%, Sp = 96%, AUC = 0.86).
Luger et al. [82]
(2020)
GFAP Prospective observational
(251 IS)
Diagnosis Stroke subtype ICH patients had higher serum level of GFAP than IS patients and mimics.
Clinical severity CT lesion volume GFAP was correlated with ICH volume (r = 0.296).
Katsanos et al. [83]
(2017)
GFAP Case-control
(191 IS; 79 controls)
Diagnosis Stroke subtype GFAP discriminated IS from ICH (Se = 91%, Sp = 97%, AUC = 0.97).
Clinical severity NIHSS No correlation has been found between serum levels of GFAP and stroke severity on admission in IS of different subtype.
Zhou et al. [84] (2016) S100B Prospective observational
(46 ICH; 71 IS)
Diagnosis Stroke subtype ICH patients had higher plasma level of S100B than IS patients.
Clinical severity NIHSS Positive correlation between S100B and infarct size (r = 0.820).
Prognosis 90-day mRS S100B predicted a poor prognosis (Se = 100%, Sp = 76%, AUC = 0.92).
Balança et al. [78]
(2020)
S100B Prospective observational
(81 SAH)
Clinical severity 3-day GOS Severe EBI was associated with higher S100B concentration at admission or day 1 (Cliff’s delta = 0.73, 95% CI [0.46; 0.88]), which predicted early recovery (AUC = 0.87).
Branco et al. [85] (2018) S100B Prospective observational
(131 IS)
Prognosis 12-week upper limb functioning S100B predicted hand functioning (Se = 69%, Sp = 90%, AUC = 0.84).
Kedziora et al. [86]
(2020)
S100B Prospective observational
(55 SAH)
Prognosis GOS at ICU discharge S100B predicted ICU outcome (Se = 91%, Sp = 63%, AUC = 0.81).
Kellermann et al. [92] (2016) S100B Prospective observational
(45 SAH)
Prognosis 6-month GOS S100N at day 1 predicted poor outcome (OR = 4.38, 95% CI, [1.08; 17]). A negative correlation was found between serum level of S100B and 6 months GOS (r = 0.434).
Kiiski et al. [87] (2018) S100B; NSE Prospective observational
(47 SAH)
Prognosis 6-month mRS No correlation has been found between biomarker concentrations and the neurological outcome.
Abboud et al. [88] (2018) S100B; NSE Prospective observational
(52 SAH)
Prognosis 6-month GOS S100B and NSE at day 1 predicted good outcome with 100% specificity.
Quintard et al. [80]
(2015)
S100B; NSE Prospective observational
(48 SAH)
Prognosis 6-month GOS Poor neurological outcome was predicted by S100B levels at day 5 (AUC = 0.91) and NSE level at day 7 (AUC = 0.83).
Aida et al. [31]
(2019)
sRAGE Prospective observational
(627 SAH)
Complication symptomatic vasospasm sRAGE level was lower in symptomatic vasospasm group on day 7, and predicted poor outcome (Se = 70%, Sp = 86%, AUC = 0.77).
Yang et al. [67] (2018) sRAGE Case-control
(108 SAH and 108 controls)
Prognosis 6-month GOS score sRAGE within 24 h after SAH was associated with clinical severity and poor 6-month outcomes (Se = 83%, Sp = 75%, AUC = 0.82).
Tang et al. [66]
(2015)
sRAGE Case-control
(106 IS and 150 controls)
Prognosis 3-month mRS sRAGE level was higher in the IS group and predicted poor neurological score (OR = 2.44, 95% CI [1.16; 5.16]).
Tsukagawa et al. [109]
(2017)
HMGB1 Case-control
(183 IS and 16 controls)
Prognosis 1-year mRS HMGB1 level on admission was a significant independent predictor of poor outcome (OR = 2.34, 95% CI [1.02; 5.38]).
Wang et al. [96] (2020) HMGB1 Prospective observational
(132 IS)
Prognosis 3-month mRS High concentration of HMGB1 at 6 h after thrombolytic therapy was associated with poor outcome (Se = 87%, Sp = 74%, AUC = 0.87).
Kiiski et al. [110]
(2017)
HMGB1 Prospective observational
(47 SAH)
Prognosis 6-month mRS No correlation has been found between biomarker concentrations and the neurological outcome.

ICH: intracerebral hemorrhage; IS: ischemic stroke; SAH: subarachnoid hemorrhage; NIHSS: national institute of health stroke scale; ICU: intensive care unit; GFAP: Glial fibrillary acidic protein; NSE: neuron-specific enolase; GOS: Glasgow outcome scale; mRS; modified Rankin scale; CT: computed tomography; CI: confidence interval; AUC: area under the curve; OR: odds ratio; PV: predictive value; Se: sensitivity; Sp: specificity; CVS: cerebral vasospasm subtype; sRAGE: soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products; HMGB1: high mobility group box 1.