Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2020 Dec 16;115:106784. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106784

Table 3.

Path analysis of the effects of treatment and stigma variables on support for drug treatment

VARIABLES Coefficient
(standard error)
Dependent variable: Binary support for redistributive drug treatment
Positive affect b1 0.207*** (0.0197)
Negative affect b2 −0.0818*** (0.0190)
Responsibility b3 −0.128*** (0.0335)
Dangerous b4 0.0224 (0.0345)
Treatment efficacy b5 0.350*** (0.0475)
Target male b6 −0.0780 (0.0831)
Heroin ending b7 0.0313 (0.0843)
Doctor b8 −0.312*** (0.0859)
Dependent variable: Positive affect
Target male a1 −0.147* (0.0781)
Heroin ending a2 0.152* (0.0781)
Doctor a3 0.371*** (0.0786)
Dependent variable: Negative affect
Target male a4 0.0874 (0.0784)
Heroin ending a5 0.180** (0.0783)
Doctor a6 −0.450*** (0.0786)
Dependent variable: Responsibility
Target male a7 0.00987 (0.0805)
Heroin ending a8 −0.0203 (0.0805)
Doctor a9 −0.825*** (0.0857)
Dependent variable: Dangerousness
Target male a10 0.238*** (0.0794)
Heroin ending a11 0.445*** (0.0797)
Doctor a12 −0.163** (0.0791)
Dependent variable: Efficacy
Target male a13 −0.104 (0.0815)
Heroin ending a14 −0.205** (0.0816)
Doctor a15 0.0880 (0.0817)
Observations 1,998

Standard errors in parentheses

***

p < .01

**

p < .05

*

p < .10