Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: Physiol Behav. 2019 Mar 8;206:13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.03.005

Table 1.

Mean comparisons between phenotypes on body weight and consumption measures taken during the Feeding Test period.

BER n = 13 BEN n = 48 BEP n = 14 Mean [S.E.M] One-way ANOVA Results
Statistics Effect size Eta Squared

F(1, 72) p η2
Feeding Test Period (13 days)
Body Weight (g)
  24hr Measurement
   BER 241.45 [3.88] 1.87 .161 .048
   BEN 244.63 [2.23]
   BEP 252.85 [1.75]
Feeding Test Days (6 days)
PF (g)
  4hr Measurement
   BER 6.69 [0.18] 52.047 .000*** .587
   BEN 8.63 [0.20]
   BEP 11.97 [0.59]
Chow (g)
  4hr Measurement
   BER 4.36 [1.23] .488 .615 .013
   BEN 4.25 [0.68]
   BEP 3.84 [0.98]
  24hr Measurement
   BER 7.40 [2.21] 1.86 .162 .048
   BEN 6.67 [1.16]
   BEP 6.71 [1.96]
Non-Feeding Test Days (7 days)
Chow (g)
  24hr Measurement
   BER 14.29 [1.44] 0.326 .722 .008
   BEN 11.74 [1.60]
   BEP 12.23 [1.31]

Note: Two-tailed p-values at α = .05 are presented for means calculated from feeding test period measures. Eta Squared values reflect effect sizes and represent the magnitude of between-group differences. S.E.M. = standard error of the mean;

***

p < .001