TABLE 1.
Antifungal activities of two extracts of R. przewalskii.
| Fungi | AERP (inhibition rates %) | EERP (inhibition rates %) | Ketoconazole (MIC mg/mL) | Azoxystrobin (inhibition rates %) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 mg/ml | 2 mg/ml | 5 mg/ml | 2 mg/ml | 0.1 mg/ml | ||
| A. niger | ND 1 | ND | ND | ND | 0.025 | – |
| S. cerevisiae | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.013 | – |
| C. albicans | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.025 | – |
| B. cinerea | 9.99 ± 1.25 aa | 2.40 ± 0.78 aa | 4.40 ± 1.11 aa | ND | – | 59.51 ± 1.34 |
| M. oryzae | 24.94 ± 2.43 aa | 11.12 ± 1.11 aa | 27.96 ± 3.25 aa | 21.39 ± 5.34 aa | – | 84.82 ± 4.87 |
| P. cyclopium | 17.03 ± 1.23 aa | 13.11 ± 2.01 aa | 24.21 ± 3.45 aa | 13.66 ± 3.28 aa | – | 80.06 ± 5.34 |
| R. stolonifer | 13.95 ± 0.95 aa | 6.19 ± 0.56 aa | 3.65 ± 1.23 aa | ND | – | 84.63 ± 2.46 |
| R. solani | 10.88 ± 2.67 aa | 6.21 ± 1.23 aa | 5.94 ± 2.13 aa | ND | – | 30.41 ± 3.26 |
| S.sclerotiorum | 67.04 ± 4.91 bb | 47.11 ± 3.25 | ND | ND | – | 34.94 ± 2.35 |
a
ND represents compounds did not show the inhibitory activity against fungi at the concentration of 5 mg/ml.
aa
Represents p < 0.01, the antifungal activity of extracts were significant weaker compared positive control azoxystrobin, ANOVA with Dunnett`s multiple comparisons test.
bb
Represents p < 0.01, the antifungal activity of extracts were significant stronger compared positive control azoxystrobin, ANOVA with Dunnett`s multiple comparisons test.