Table 3.
Univariate and multivariate models of potential risk factors for substantial injuries.
| Non-Injured (n = 105) |
Injured (n = 80) |
Univariate Analysis OR (95% CI) |
Multivariate Analysis OR (95% CI) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (female) | 69 (65.7%) | 58 (72.5%) | 1.38 (0.73–2.60) | 1.14 (0.52–2.50) | 0.97 (0.44–2.15) | 1.01 (0.46–2.21) | 1.04 (0.49–2.22) |
| Age (years) | 19.04 ± 1.27 | 19.08 ± 1.44 | 1.02 (0.82–1.27) | 0.95 (0.75−1.20) | 0.95 (0.75–1.20) | 0.95 (0.75–1.20) | 0.95 (0.75–1.20) |
| Educational Program | |||||||
| Bachelor dance Bachelor dance teacher |
73 (69.5%) 32 (30.5%) |
44 (55.0%) 36 (45.0%) |
Ref. 1.87 (1.02–3.42) |
Ref. 1.57 (0.73–3.39) |
Ref. 1.78 (0.83–3.82) |
Ref. 1.79 (0.84–3.83) |
Ref. 1.70 (0.81–3.58) |
| Previous long-lasting injury (yes) # | 23 (22.3%) | 37 (48.1%) | 3.22 (1.69–6.13) | 2.96 (1.50–5.84) | 2.85 (1.45–5.61) | 2.76 (1.42–5.37) | 2.84 (1.45–5.59) |
| Generalized joint hypermobility * | |||||||
| Beighton score (0–9) | 2.92 ± 2.38 | 2.71 ± 2.31 | 0.96 (0.85–1.09) | 0.94 (0.81–1.08) | |||
| Not hypermobile (0–3) Hypermobile (4–6) Extreme hypermobile (7–9) |
73 (71.6%) 13 (12.7%) 16 (15.7%) |
56 (70.0%) 12 (15.0%) 12 (15.0%) |
Ref. 1.20 (0.51–2.84) 0.98 (0.43–2.23) |
Ref. 1.33 (0.51–3.43) 0.90 (0.35–2.27) |
|||
| Not hypermobile (0–3) Hypermobile (4–9) |
73 (71.6%) 29 (28.4%) |
56 (70.0%) 24 (30.0%) |
Ref. 1.08 (0.57–2.05) |
Ref. 1.08 (0.52–2.25) |
|||
| Not hypermobile (0–5) Hypermobile (6–9) |
86 (84.3%) 16 (15.7%) |
68 (85.0%) 12 (15.0%) |
Ref. 0.95 (0.42–2.14) |
Ref. 0.84 (0.34–2.10) |
|||
| Nagelkerke R2 | 0.115 | 0.113 | 0.110 | 0.110 | |||
Data are presented as mean (SD) or number (%). # missing data of n = 5 (5 students of Bachelor of Dance), * missing data of n = 3 (1 student of Bachelor of Dance, 2 students of Bachelor of Dance Teacher), Ref. = reference; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval. Bold, significant associations.