Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2021 Feb 22;24(2):51–94. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2021.1884921

Table 2.

Factors impacting toxicokinetics in C. elegans

Factor Process(es) Likely Impacted References
Worm Age Uptake (due to cuticle thickness), Metabolism (age-related changes in gene expression), Sensitivity to toxicity (Helmcke et al. 2009)
Worm strain Uptake (cuticle integrity, transporter expression), Distribution (transporter expression), Metabolism (gene expression), Excretion (transporter expression), Sensitivity to toxicity (Crone et al. 2015; Davies et al. 2003)
Delivery Method or Medium Apparent External Dose, Uptake (pharyngeal pumping rate, cuticle diffusion, co-solvent delivery) (Zheng et al. 2013; Alaimo et al. 2012; Burns et al. 2010)
Presence or Absence of Bacteria Apparent External Dose, Uptake (delivery of compound by adsorption/internalization by bacteria, pharyngeal pumping rate) (Yang et al 2017; Spann et al 2015; Höss et al 2011; Offermann et al 2009)
Bacterial Density Apparent External Dose, Uptake (delivery of compound by adsorption/internalization by bacteria, pharyngeal pumping rate) (Offermann et al 2009; Höss et al 2011)
Presence of Organic Matter Apparent External Dose, Uptake (co-solvent delivery) (Hoss et al. 2009; Haitzer et al. 1999)
Washing Worms Before Extraction Apparent Internal Concentration (Mitchell et al. 2007)
Co-Exposures Uptake (competition for transport, co-solvent delivery), Metabolism (competition for metabolic enzymes), Sensitivity to toxicity (Wyatt et al. 2016a)