Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 27;9(3):1480–1490. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2118

TABLE 1.

Selected characteristics of participants according to type 2 diabetes status in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2007–2014) a

Characteristic b Diabetes (n = 3,432) Nondiabetes (n = 17,048) p‐value c
Age (year) 59.4 (0.30) 45.7 (0.30) <0.001
Female 185 (48.4) 994 (52.6) 0.001
BMI (kg/m2) 33.1 (0.2) 28.2 (0.0) <0.001
Race
NHW 1,369 (60.3) 8,668 (68.6) 0.013
NHB 1,055 (16.4) 3,786 (10.6)
MA 649 (9.4) 2,746 (8.3)
Others 752 (13.9) 3,901 (12.5)
Education
Less than 9th grade 710 (11.4) 1834 (5.1) <0.001
9th−11th grades 715 (15.3) 2,785 (11.3)
High school grad./GED or equivalent 888 (24.9) 4,345 (22.2)
Some college or AA degree 960 (30.2) 5,545 (31.0)
College graduate or above 543 (18.0) 4,569 (30.2)
Current smokers 652 (19.6) 4,252 (25.4) <0.001
Current drinkers 2,161 (67.4) 12,125 (78.6) <0.001
Exercised regularly 432 (13.9) 3,300 (20.7) <0.001
Income
Under $20,000 1,043 (27.3) 3,935 (14.1) 0.075
$20,000 to $45,000 1,386 (36.2) 6,098 (27.1)
$45,000 to $75,000 627 (16.4) 3,358 (20.2)
$75,000 to $100,000 242 (6.3) 1691 (11.5)
Over $100,000 334 (8.7) 3,100 (23.6)
Family history of type 2 diabetes 128 (3.7) 1714 (10.1) <0.001
Energy intake (kcal/day) 1895.3 (21.4) 2092.28 (8.6) <0.001
Calcium(mg/day) 890.3 (13.4) 960.36 (6.9) <0.001
Magnesium (mg/day) 278.9 (3.5) 300.56 (2.1) <0.001
Ratio of calcium to magnesium(mg/day) 3.3 (0.0) 3.32 (0.0) 0.335
Vitamin D (μg/day) 4.7 (0.1) 4.67 (0.0) 0.742
Above RDA calcium 923 (26.9) 5,966 (35.0) <0.001
Above RDA magnesium 497 (14.5) 3,696 (21.7) <0.001
Above RDA vitamin D 87 (2.5) 528 (3.1) 0.937
Fasting insulin (pmol/L) 129.2 (5.4) 71.9 (1.0) <0.001
Fasting glucose (mmol/L) 8.65 (0.1) 5.4 (0.0) <0.001
2‐hr glucose (mmol/L) 12.41 (0.3) 6.1 (0.0) <0.001
HDL (mmol/L) 1.2 (0.0) 1.3 (0.0) <0.001
TC (mmol/L) 4.8 (0.0) 5.0 (0.0) 0.015
TG (mmol/L) 1.9 (0.0) 1.3 (0.0) <0.001
SBP (mmHg) 129.9 (0.4) 120.5 (0.2) <0.001
DBP (mmHg) 69.0 (0.3) 70.6 (0.2) 0.001
HOMA‐IR 9.3 (0.3) 2.5 (0.0) <0.001
HOMA‐beta 90.1 (3.5) 100.7 (7.0) <0.001
a

All data analyses conducted in the present study were based on weighted estimates with sample weight provided by NHANES.

c

Univariate logistic regression models were used for continuous and categorical variables.

b

Continuous variables are presented as mean (standard error). Categorical variables are presented as n (%).