TABLE 2.
Target | Sample | No. of reads | No. of OTUs a | Chao1 index | Shannon index | Simpson index | Good's coverage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bacterial analysis | K1 | 71,740 | 35 | 35 | 1.80 | 0.20 | 0.99995 |
K2 | 55,567 | 20 | 22 | 1.13 | 0.34 | 0.99992 | |
K3 | 52,767 | 33 | 35 | 1.11 | 0.43 | 0.99992 | |
C1 | 63,804 | 22 | 24 | 0.54 | 0.77 | 0.99995 | |
C2 | 61,477 | 29 | 31 | 1.14 | 0.52 | 0.99991 | |
C3 | 67,144 | 28 | 31 | 1.49 | 0.34 | 0.99994 | |
A1 | 62,489 | 25 | 26 | 0.65 | 0.73 | 0.99995 | |
A2 | 65,960 | 35 | 37 | 1.06 | 0.50 | 0.99992 | |
A3 | 65,279 | 41 | 49 | 0.94 | 0.60 | 0.99990 | |
Fungal analysis | K1 | 121,898 | 16 | 22 | 0.49 | 0.73 | 0.99997 |
K2 | 119,768 | 10 | 13 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.99998 | |
K3 | 92,949 | 17 | 19 | 0.72 | 0.55 | 0.99996 | |
C1 | 123,809 | 32 | 43 | 0.81 | 0.62 | 0.99992 | |
C2 | 82,914 | 18 | 19 | 0.37 | 0.84 | 0.99998 | |
C3 | 89,470 | 15 | 16 | 0.46 | 0.74 | 0.99997 | |
A1 | 120,416 | 20 | 22 | 0.39 | 0.79 | 0.99997 | |
A2 | 124,633 | 11 | 14 | 0.02 | 1.00 | 0.99998 | |
A3 | 118,497 | 19 | 19 | 0.97 | 0.52 | 0.99998 |
Operational taxonomic units.