Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2020 Jul 22;584(7819):148–153. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2546-8

Extended Data Figure 11. Metabolic engineering of colchicine alkaloids in Nicotiana benthamiana.

Extended Data Figure 11.

a) Biosynthetic scheme of the transient metabolic engineering system in N. benthamiana for the production of 2 and 9. b) LC-MS chromatograms for the co-expression of GsOMT1 with module 1, module 2, and Δ24-CjNCS compared to that of GsOMT1 expressed alone with co-infiltration of 1. Shown are the extracted ion chromatograms (EICs) for 1 (blue traces, m/z 286.1438) and the production of 2 (red traces, m/z 300.1594). c) LC-MS chromatograms demonstrating the production of 9 via co-expression of module 3 (without GsCYP71FB1) with module 1, module 2, and Δ24-CjNCS. This is compared to infiltration of 1 (as substrate) with co-expression of module 3 (without GsCYP71FB1), as well as to a standard of O-methylandrocymbine (9). Shown are the EICs specific to the exact mass of 9 (m/z 386.1962). Engineered production of 2 and 9 was demonstrated three times for each molecule. d) Production of two different colchicine alkaloids (2, m/z 300.1594; 10, m/z 400.1755, 422.1574) via metabolic engineering in N. benthamiana when GsAER is either omitted or included. Filled-in boxes (gray) indicate the presence of a module/gene within the co-expression experiment, while an empty box (white) indicates its absence. Shown for each reaction is the mean of 6 biological replicates ± standard deviation for each condition. Statistical significance was assessed using a two-tailed Student’s t-test with an assumption of unequal variance. Production of 2 in this context was assessed once, while production of 10 was performed twice with similar results each time. e) Individual dropout of each module 1 and module 2 gene within the engineered production of 10 (m/z 400.1755, 422.1574). Shown for each reaction is the mean ± standard deviation for each reaction condition. n=3 for GFP control; n=5 for PAL, CCR, AER, C4H, TyDC/DDC, and BvCYP76AD5 dropouts; n=6 for 4CL and DAHPS dropouts and for the no-dropout control. All replicates represent independent biological replicates. Statistical comparisons made using Dunnett’s test (two-tailed) with comparison to the full pathway control (indicated by arrow). *** = P < 0.001. This experiment was performed twice, with similar results each time.