Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 24;12:608846. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.608846

Table 4.

Performance of previously identified African signatures in the diagnosis of TB disease in the Norwegian cohort and the combined Norwegian and South African cohort.

Biosignature AUC (95% CI) Sens (95%CI) Spec (95%CI) Sens (95%CI) Spec (95%CI) PPV (95%CI) NPV (95%CI)
Accuracy in training set Accuracy in test set or after leave-one-out cross-validation
NORWEGIAN COHORT
*Chegou et al.
(9) (CRP, SAA, IFN-γ, IP-10, CFH, ApoA-1)
0.84
(0.75–0.93)
69.9%
(58.8–79.5)
88.2%
(63.6–98.5)
67.5%
(56.3–77.4)
64.7%
(38.3–85.8)
90.3%
(82.8–94.8)
30%
(20.3–39.4)
Jacobs et al. (10) (CRP, SAP, NCAM-1, Ferritin, I-309, GDF-15) 0.94
(0.90–0.99)
81.2%
(71.2–88.8)
94.7%
(74–99.9)
78.8%
(68.6–86.9)
89.5%
(66.9–98.7)
97.1%
(89.9–99.2)
48.6%
(37.9–59.4)
NORWEGIAN AND SOUTH AFRICAN COHORTS COMBINED
Training set (n = 105; n = 56 TB, n = 49 ORD) Test set (n = 43; n = 22 TB, n = 21 ORD)
*Chegou et al. (9) (CRP, SAA, IFN-γ, IP-10, CFH, ApoA-1) 0.85
(0.77–0.92)
75%
(61.6–85.6)
77.6%
(63.4–88.2)
63.6%
(40.7–82.8)
80.9%
(58.1–94.5)
77.8%
(57.8–89.9)
68%
(54.1–79.3)
Jacobs et al. (10) (CRP, SAP, NCAM-1, Ferritin, I-309, GDF-15) 0.87
(0.80–0.94)
75%
(61.6–85.6)
85.7%
(72.8–94.1)
63.6%
(40.7–82.8)
76.2%
(52.8–91.7)
73.7%
(55–86.5)
66.7%
(52.3–78.5)

Previously published biosignatures; a serum biosignature (9), and a plasma biosignature (10), were evaluated in the Norwegian cohort and in Norwegian and South African cohorts combined.

*

One of the key biomarkers in the 7-marker serum biosignature (transthyretin) was unavailable, hence data shown is for performance of the remaining 6 analytes in the signature.

AUC, Area under the ROC curve; Sens, sensitivity; Spec, specificity; PPV, Positive predictive value; NPV, Negative predictive value; CI, Confidence Interval.