Table 2.
Predicted Margins of Financial Hardship Measures after Multi-level, Multivariable Adjustment
All Patients | No Low-Income Subsidies | Low-Income Subsidies | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adherence (N=4,153) |
Monthly Out-of-Pocket (N=3,353) |
Total Out-of-Pocket (N=3,353) |
Monthly Out-of-Pocket (N=800) |
Total Out-of-Pocket (N=800) |
||||||
Margin, p-value | Margin, p-value | Margin, p-value | Margin, p-value | Margin, p-value | ||||||
Age (years) | ||||||||||
<70 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||||
70–74 | 0.69 | 0.36 | 0.13 | 0.88 | 0.74 | |||||
75–79 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 0.53 | |||||
80–84 | 0.15 | 0.03 | <0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | |||||
85+ | <0.01 | 0.05 | <0.01 | 0.10 | 0.11 | |||||
Race | ||||||||||
White | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||||
African American | 0.51 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | |||||
Hispanic | 0.60 | 0.07 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | |||||
Missing | 0.35 | 0.73 | 0.15 | <0.01 | <0.01 | |||||
Socioeconomic Status Tertile | ||||||||||
Low | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||||
Medium | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.58 | |||||
High | 0.91 | 0.35 | 0.15 | 0.62 | 0.64 | |||||
Missing | 0.88 | 0.65 | 0.95 | 0.11 | 0.07 | |||||
Low-Income Subsidy | ||||||||||
No | Ref | - | - | - | - | |||||
Yes | <0.01 | - | - | - | - | |||||
% African American | 0.42 | 0.59 | 0.20 | 0.42 | 0.35 | |||||
1 (0.3%) | ||||||||||
2 (1.7%) | ||||||||||
3 (3.5%) | ||||||||||
4 (7.4%) | ||||||||||
5 (18.7%) | ||||||||||
% Hispanic | 0.01 | <0.01 | 0.10 | 0.59 | 0.98 | |||||
1 (0.4%) | ||||||||||
2 (0.8%) | ||||||||||
3 (1.7%) | ||||||||||
4 (3.8%) | ||||||||||
5 (10.8%) | ||||||||||
% Eligible for Medicaid | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.32 | 0.43 | |||||
1 (8.0%) | ||||||||||
2 (10.5%) | ||||||||||
3 (12.7%) | ||||||||||
4 (14.9%) | ||||||||||
5 (20.4%) | ||||||||||
Average HCC Score | 0.12 | 0.19 | 0.02 | 0.98 | 0.99 | |||||
1 (0.86) | ||||||||||
2 (0.91) | ||||||||||
3 (0.95) | ||||||||||
4 (0.99) | ||||||||||
5 (1.05) | ||||||||||
% Prescriptions By Urologist | 0.99 | 0.23 | 0.53 | 0.28 | 0.17 | |||||
1 (0.0%) | ||||||||||
2 (7.7%) | ||||||||||
3 (14.3%) | ||||||||||
4 (21.6%) | ||||||||||
5 (40.0%) |
HCC, hierarchical condition category.
Outcome measures (adherence, monthly out-of-pocket payment, total out-of-pocket payment) were modeled over the first six months of treatment. Payment models (i.e. monthly out-of-pocket and total out-of-pocket) were modeled separately by low-income subsidy status. Models were constructed at the patient level, and included covariates for patient age, race, socioeconomic status at the zip code level, low-income subsidy status (adherence measure only), and geographic variables that characterize the different hospital-referral regions where patients reside. Characteristics of hospital-referral regions were based on all HRRs, except % urologists which was based on HRRs where at least one urologist wrote a prescription. HRR characteristics were modeled as continuous variables, but predictive margins were displayed for the median of each quintile. Significant findings (p<0.05) are bolded.