Table 2:
Comparison of the number of times each feature was selected for both the targeted (PRM) and untargeted (DDA) MS/MS analyses compared to the average number of scans each was detected in during the full scan acquisitions.
| m/z | FS | PRM-1 | Ave | Effciency (Avg/FS) | DDA-1 | Ave | Effciency (Avg/FS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 387 | 30 | 15 | 14 | 47% | 6 | 5 | 18% |
| 403 | 21 | 14 | 11 | 52% | 3 | 2 | 10% |
| 419 | 19 | 11 | 7 | 37% | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| 228 | 91 | 57 | 56 | 61% | 12 | 9 | 10% |
| 242 | 37 | 23 | 16 | 44% | 0 | 4 | 11% |
| 242 | 18 | 15 | 13 | 72% | 0 | 4 | 22% |
| 242 | 30 | 20 | 21 | 69% | 0 | 5 | 17% |
| 258 | 10 6 |
26 | 24 | 23% | 13 | 11 | 11% |
| 272 | 95 | 24 | 22 | 23% | 12 | 10 | 11% |
| 48% | 12% |