Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: Electrophoresis. 2019 Oct 4;40(22):2921–2928. doi: 10.1002/elps.201900220

Table 2:

Comparison of the number of times each feature was selected for both the targeted (PRM) and untargeted (DDA) MS/MS analyses compared to the average number of scans each was detected in during the full scan acquisitions.

m/z FS PRM-1 PRM-2 PRM-3 Ave Effciency (Avg/FS) DDA-1 DDA-2 DDA-3 Ave Effciency (Avg/FS)
387 30 15 13 14 14 47% 6 5 5 5 18%
403 21 14 9 10 11 52% 3 2 1 2 10%
419 19 11 10 0 7 37% 0 0 0 0 0%
228 91 57 69 41 56 61% 12 9 6 9 10%
242 37 23 26 0 16 44% 0 0 12 4 11%
242 18 15 13 11 13 72% 0 5 7 4 22%
242 30 20 21 21 21 69% 0 8 7 5 17%
258 10
6
26 28 19 24 23% 13 11 10 11 11%
272 95 24 26 15 22 23% 12 10 8 10 11%
48% 12%