Table 3.
3a. Parameters
Exploratory Cohort |
Prognostic Value for Second-Line Chemotherapy | |||
Univariate Analysis | Multivariable Analysis | |||
p-Value | HR (95% CI) | p-Value | ||
Log growth rate constant > −3.32 | 0.006 | 2.13 (1.37–3.32) | 0.005 | 1.92 (1.22–3.03) |
Therapy-free interval > 6 months | 0.014 | 1.93 (0.96–3.87) | 0.524 | 1.29 (0.59–2.82) |
Age at time of therapy > 60 years | 0.005 | 1.82 (1.17–2.85) | - | - |
Platinum-based therapy yes/no | <0.001 | 2.66 (1.69–4.17) | 0.001 | 2.34 (1.41–3.87) |
Bevacizumab received yes/no | 0.934 | 1.02 (0.60–1.76) | 0.504 | 1.25 (0.65–2.38) |
No primary surgery residual tumor (R0) | 0.045 | 1.46 (0.93–2.29) | - | - |
FIGO stage (2014) > FIGO IIIc | 0.595 | 1.32 (0.66–2.65) | - | - |
3b. Parameters
Validation Cohort |
Prognostic Value for Second-Line Chemotherapy | |||
Univariate Analysis | Multivariable Analysis | |||
p-Value | HR (95% CI) | p-Value | ||
Log growth rate constant >−3.32 | <0.001 | 3.31 (1.74–6.29) | 0.002 | 2.90 (1.50–5.59) |
Therapy-free interval >6 months | <0.001 | 1.44 (0.73–2.81) | 0.642 | 1.13 (0.83–1.79) |
Age at time of therapy >60 years | <0.001 | 1.58 (1.01–2.48) | - | - |
Platinum-based therapy yes/no | 0.001 | 2.10 (1.30–3.39) | 0.015 | 2.23 (1.17–4.23) |
CI: Confidence interval, FIGO: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, HR: Hazard ratio.