Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 9;7:e365. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.365

Figure 2. Performance analysis of CNN, LSTM, and RF for binary classification.

Figure 2

Three distinct organisms (yeast, Arabidopsis thaliana, human) were used. (A), (B) and (C): The accuracy performance of CNN, LSTM, and RF for various k-mer sizes. A significant difference in the performance of DL and ML techniques for each k-mer size was observed. (D), (E) and (F): The accuracy performance of CNN, LSTM, and RF on each species. A significant difference in the performance of DL and ML techniques for each organism was observed. (* statistically significant, ** statistically more significant, n.s. non-significant).