Table 1. A summary of recent related studies.
Article | Purpose | Class | Method | Accuracy (%) | Limitation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Khan et al. (2020b) | Ulcer, polyp, bleeding detection | 4 | RCNN, ResNet101, and SVM | 99.13 |
|
Khan et al. (2020a) | Ulcer, and bleeding detection | 3 | VGG-16, PSO, and SVM | 98.4 |
|
Igarashi et al. (2020) | Classify several GI diseases | 14 | AlexNet | 96.5 |
|
Alaskar et al. (2019) | Ulcer detection | 2 | AlexNet & Google Net | 97.143 |
|
Owais et al. (2019) | Classification of multiple GI diseases |
37 | ResNet-18 and LSTM | 89.95 |
|
Fan et al. (2018) | Ulcer and Erosion detection | 2 | AlexNet | 95.16 95.34 |
|
He et al. (2018) | Hookworm detection | 2 | VGG-16 and Inception | 88.5 |
|
Yuan & Meng (2017) | Polyps detection | 2 | Stacked sparse auto-encoder with image manifold | 98 |
|
Pei et al. (2017) | Bowel detection and assessment | 2 | LSTM and PCA | 88.8 |
|
Sharif et al. (2019) | Ulcer, and bleeding detection | 3 | VGG-16, VGG-19, geometric features, KNN | 99.42 |
|
Ghatwary, Ye & Zolgharni (2019) | Esophageal cancer detection | 2 | Gabor Filter. faster R-CNN, and SVM | 95 |
|
Billah, Waheed & Rahman (2017) | Polyps detection | 2 | Color based DWT,CNN, and SVM | 98.65 |
|
Nadeem et al. (2018) | Classification of several GI diseases | 8 | VGG-19, Haralick and LBP texture analysis, and logistic regression | 83 |
|
Majid et al. (2020) | Bleeding, esophagitis, polyp, and ulcerative-colitis classification | 5 | DCT, color based statistical features, DWT, VGG-16, GA, and E | 96.5 |
|
Nguyen et al. (2020) | Classifying images to normal and abnormal | 2 | DenseNet, Inception, and VGG-16 | 70.7 |
|
Owais et al. (2020) | Classification of multiple GI diseases |
37 | DenseNet and LSTM | 95.75 |
|