Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Dent Assoc. 2020 Nov;151(11):835–845.e31. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2020.07.021

Table 3.

The performance of different algorithms for identifying when antibiotic prophylaxis has been prescribed in large administrative data sets.

VARIABLE AP* LIKELY VERSUS AP POSSIBLE OR AP UNLIKELY AP LIKELY OR AP POSSIBLE VERSUS AP UNLIKELY
Algorithm A
Sensitivity, % (confidence interval) 25.4 (19.4 to 32.1) 18.0 (13.6 to 23.0)
Specificity, % (confidence interval) 100 (99.7 to 100) 100 (99.7 to 100)
PPV, % 100 100
NPV, % (confidence interval) 90.6 (89.8 to 91.2) 85.3 (84.6 to 86.0)
Positive likelihood ratio NA§ NA
Negative likelihood ratio (confidence interval) 0.75 (0.69 to 0.81) 0.82 (0.78 to 19.31)
Algorithm B
Sensitivity, % (confidence interval) 53.9 (46.6 to 61.1) 42.5 (36.6 to 48.6)
Specificity, % (confidence interval) 99.0 (98.3 to 99.4) 99.9 (99.5 to 100)
PPV, % (confidence interval) 88.1 (81.3 to 92.7) 98.3 (93.5 to 99.6)
NPV, % (confidence interval) 93.9 (93.0 to 94.7) 89.2 (88.2 to 90.2)
Positive likelihood ratio (confidence interval) 53.15 (31.09 to 90.96) 276.40 (68.73 to 111.63)
Negative likelihood ratio (confidence interval) 0.47 (0.40 to 0.54) 0.58 (0.52 to 0.64)
Algorithm C
Sensitivity, % (confidence interval) 87.6 (82.1 to 91.9) 75.8 (70.3 to 80.8)
Specificity, % (confidence interval) 95.5 (94.3 to 96.5) 98.2 (97.3 to 98.8)
PPV, % (confidence interval) 73.2 (68.0 to 77.8) 89.6 (85.2 to 92.8)
NPV, % (confidence interval) 98.2 (97.4 to 98.8) 95.1 (94.0 to 96.0)
Positive likelihood ratio (confidence interval) 19.50 (15.21 to 25.02) 41.10 (27.50 to 61.44)
Negative likelihood ratio (confidence interval) 0.13 (0.09 to 0.19) 0.25 (0.20 to 0.30)
*

AP: Antibiotic prophylaxis.

PPV: Positive predictive value.

NPV: Negative predictive value.

§

NA: Not applicable.